Wikiwand AI

2021 Plano municipal elections

Municipal Election From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2021 Plano municipal elections took place on May 1, 2021. In addition to the mayoral election (Place 6), seats were contested for Places 2, 4, and 8, as well as a special election for Place 7.[1] No candidate received a majority of the total vote in Places 2 and 7, so the two top vote-earners advanced to a runoff election.[2] This election took place on June 5, 2021.[3] Due to term limits, incumbent mayor Harry LaRosiliere was ineligible to run for a third term.[4]

Quick facts Turnout, Candidate ...
Plano municipal election, 2021

← 2019
May 1, 2021 (first round), June 5, 2021 (runoff)
2023 →
Turnout20.20% Increase
 
Candidate John Muns Lily Bao
Popular vote 18,482 15,119
Percentage 52.86% 43.24%

Muns:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%
Bao:      40–50%      50–60%
Tie:      40–50%

Mayor before election

Harry LaRosiliere

Elected mayor

John Muns

Close

Council seats

Place 2 precinct results by margin of victory

Place 2

The incumbent, Anthony Ricciardelli, won re-election to a second term. Steve Lavine challenged him.[2]

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
Anthony Ricciardelli 17,477 52.83%
Steve Lavine 15,606 47.17%
Close
Place 4 precinct results by margin of victory

Place 4

The incumbent, Kayci Prince, ran for re-election to a second term. Justin Adcock, Nassat Parveen, and Vidal Quintanilla also contested this race.

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
Justin Adcock 13,807 42.55%
Kayci Prince 12,494 38.51%
Nassat Parveen 4,594 14.16%
Vidal Quintanilla 1,513 4.78%
Close
Place 4 runoff precinct results by margin of victory

Runoff

No candidate received 50% of the vote, so a runoff was held between Prince and Adcock on June 5, 2021.[2] Prince won the runoff, retaining her seat on the council.[7]

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[8][9]
Kayci Prince 12,304 55.77%
Justin Adcock 9,757 44.23%
Close
Place 6 precinct results by margin of victory

Place 6 (Mayor)

The incumbent mayor, Harry LaRosiliere, was ineligible to run for a third term due to term limits.[4] John Muns won the open seat, defeating challengers Lily Bao and Lydia Ortega.[2]

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
John Muns 18,482 52.86%
Lily Bao 15,119 43.24%
Lydia Ortega 1,362 3.90%
Close
Place 7 precinct results by margin of victory

Place 7 (special election)

The incumbent, Lily Bao, resigned from her seat in order to run for mayor. A special election was called to determine who will serve the remainder of her term, which expires in 2023. Bao held her seat on the council until after the certification of the election's results.[10] Julie Holmer, Bill Lisle III, Chris Robertson, David M. Smith, and Sandeep Srivastava ran for the open seat.[11]

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
Julie Holmer 10,910 33.82%
Chris Robertson 10,516 32.60%
David M. Smith 4,595 14.24%
Sandeep Srivastava 3,779 11.72%
Bill Lisle III 2,455 7.61%
Close
Place 7 runoff precinct results by margin of victory

Runoff

No candidate received 50% of the vote, so a runoff was held between Holmer and Robertson on June 5, 2021.[2] Holmer won the runoff, filling Bao's seat until her term expires in 2023.[12]

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[8][9]
Julie Holmer 11,756 53.36%
Chris Robertson 10,275 46.64%
Close
Place 8 precinct results by margin of victory

Place 8

The incumbent, Rick Smith, won re-election to a second term. Elisa Klein challenged him.[2]

More information Candidate, Vote number ...
Candidate Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
Rick Smith 17,084 52.95%
Elisa Klein 15,180 47.05%
Close

Propositions

Proposition A

The following question appeared on the ballot:

The issuance of $231,000,000 general obligation bonds for street improvements and the imposition of a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.[13]

More information Vote number, Vote percentage ...
Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
For 25,575 76.27%
Against 7,956 23.73%
Close

Proposition B

The following question appeared on the ballot:

The issuance of $81,935,000 general obligation bonds for park and recreational facilities and the imposition of a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.

More information Vote number, Vote percentage ...
Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
For 23,473 70.16%
Against 9,983 29.84%
Close

Proposition C

The following question appeared on the ballot:

The issuance of $15,900,000 general obligation bonds for improvements to the Tom Muehlenbeck Recreation Center and the imposition of a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.

More information Vote number, Vote percentage ...
Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
For 18,185 55.16%
Against 14,782 44.84%
Close

Proposition D

The following question appeared on the ballot:

The issuance of $27,140,000 general obligation bonds for public safety facilities and the imposition of a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.

More information Vote number, Vote percentage ...
Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
For 23,655 71.65%
Against 9,361 28.35%
Close

Proposition E

The following question appeared on the ballot:

The issuance of $5,500,000 general obligation bonds for improvements to existing municipal facilities and the imposition of a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.

More information Vote number, Vote percentage ...
Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
For 19,783 60.66%
Against 12,832 39.34%
Close

Proposition F

The following question appeared on the ballot:

The issuance of $2,490,000 general obligation bonds for the city's library facilities and the imposition of a tax sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.

More information Vote number, Vote percentage ...
Vote number Vote percentage[5][6]
For 23,761 72.00%
Against 9,239 28.00%
Close

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks