2025 Maldivian protests
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Repeal of the "Maldives Media and Broadcasting Regulation Bill"
- Restore authority of local government councils
- Resignation of President Mohamed Muizzu
| 2025 Maldivian protests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Gen-Z protests in Asia | |||
| Date | 20 September 2025 – 18 November 2025 (1 month and 29 days) | ||
| Location | |||
| Caused by | Media control law, restriction of local governmental authority, corruption | ||
| Goals |
| ||
| Methods | Protests | ||
| Resulted in | Failed:
| ||
| Parties | |||
| |||
| Lead figures | |||
| Casualties | |||
| Arrested | 8 | ||
The 2025 Maldivian protests were protests in the Maldives from September until November against perceived government corruption and democratic backsliding as part of the wider Gen Z protests.
The People's National Congress, which came to power in the 2023 and 2024 elections holds basically unchecked power in the Maldives with 79 of the country's 93 seats in its People's Majlis as well as the presidency, and are thus allowed to pass any bill they please, with no opposition.[1]
New laws had been passed issuing restrictions on the powers and authority of the local governments of the Maldives, the island councils, as well as the "Maldives Media and Broadcasting Regulation Bill" which enabled fines, suspension, or cancellation of media licenses at the discretion of the state.[2][3] Additionally, the media bill would have created a single, overarching state-run media regulator, that also had jurisdiction over what journalists posted online.[1] This regulator would have the authority to do everything except shut a media firm down, such as levying fines and suspending outlets that posted stories contrary to "religious norms, national security or public order."[1] Minister of Foreign Affairs Abdulla Khaleel stated that the goal of the bill was to establish "clear standards and a code of conduct" and to "address the challenges of misinformation, disinformation and coordinated manipulation of content."[1]
The Media law saw significant backlash from local media with journalists calling it a "muzzle" that seeks to end the freedom of speech in the country.[1]