Under Taiwan's Public Officials Election and Recall Act, the recall vote would only pass if more than one-quarter of all eligible voters in the constituency cast favourable votes; when a recall is not passed, the same person cannot be recalled for the remainder of the term in office.
All attempts to recall members of the opposition KMT failed. Both the main wave of recall votes on 26 July and the second on 23 August were unsuccessful, with a majority of voters rejecting to recall them in each case.[1][2]
The 2024 Taiwanese general election resulted in a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) victory for the presidency, but failure to retain the control of the parliament, with the opposition Kuomintang (KMT) and Taiwan People's Party (TPP) winning a total of 62 seats (including the KMT's 52 seats, TPP's 8, and 2 KMT-aligned independents) in the 113-seat Legislative Yuan. Pro-government groups and politicians accused the opposition of undermining the country's constitutional order, slashing government spending, and weakening efforts to bolster defense capabilities against Chinese military threats. A massive wave of recalls, also known as "The Great Recall", was initiated by the Bluebird movement, aiming to secure a majority by the governing DPP in the parliament.[3][4] Campaigners went further and framed the recalls as an effort to "oppose Communist China" and "defend Taiwan".[5]
Under the Public Officials Election and Recall Act, 1% of eligible voters in a constituency is required at the first stage, and 10% at the second stage, to trigger a recall vote. Members elected through the party-list cannot be recalled.[4]
Out of the 39 KMT constituency legislators, recall bids for 35 were filed, and 31 of which were established. KMT-affiliated groups attempted to recall 15 of the DPP's 38 directly elected MPs, but none were approved by the Central Election Commission due to insufficient signatures.[4][6] The KMT accused the authorities for persecuting their members after around 100 members of the pan-blue coalition were charged with various crimes including forgery and breach of personal data law.[5]
CEC said the cost of each legislator recall vote ranges from NT$16 million to NT$20 million.[7]
Results
Thirty-one members of the Legislative Yuan faced recall, all from the opposition KMT. They included caucus whip Fu Kun-chi and lawmakers across Taiwan. One mayor and one county councilor were also petitioned to be vacated.
The first vote amidst the Great Recall campaign was led by Lin Ching-tung against Chen Yu-ling, a member of the Nantou County Council.[8] Chen is also the sole politician from the DPP facing the threat of removal,[9] and, as a result, decided not to campaign against her recall in order to avoid diverting the party's effort at other recall campaigns.[10]
The vote was held on 13 July 2025. While the recall was supported by over 67% of the valid ballots cast, receiving 12,160 votes, it failed to pass the threshold of removal at 14,302 votes, which equates to one-quarter of all eligible voters of 57,207.[11]
Recall of Chen Yu-ling
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
12,160
67.45
Against recall
5,867
32.55
Total
18,027
100.00
Valid votes
18,027
99.21
Invalid/blank votes
144
0.79
Total votes
18,171
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
57,207
31.76
NNot recalled
26 July: Legislators
The first round of votes against Legislative Yuan members were held on 26 July 2025. All 24 members retained their seats and defeated the DPP's recall attempt, with only 7 of those bids passing the legal threshold (Wang Hung-wei, Lee Yen-hsiu, Hsu Chiao-hsin, Yeh Yuan-chih, Cheng Cheng-chien, Lo Ting-wei, Fu Kun-chi). Yeh's vote was the closest, with 3,560 votes short of unseating.[12] The average turnout of the 26 July votes was over 55%, marking the highest amongst all recall votes held in Taiwan.[13]
In Keelung, lawmaker Jonathan Lin faces recall for, amongst multiple reasons, inciting parliamentary violence, lambasting civil servants and undermining national security, defaming civil groups that initiated the unseating campaign, and misogynistic behaviour.[14] The bid was defeated by a majority of votes against and without reaching the necessary threshold of 75,995.
Recall of Jonathan Lin
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
65,143
40.35
Against recall
96,294
59.65
Total
161,437
100.00
Valid votes
161,437
99.49
Invalid/blank votes
826
0.51
Total votes
162,263
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
303,980
53.38
NNot recalled
Taipei
Five Taipei lawmakers were targeted in this round of votes. Wang Hung-wei and Hsu Chiao-hsin were considered the prime targets for their controversial comments in the past.
Wang was accused of undermining national security after meeting Chinese officials and groups responsible for or supporting "reunification with Taiwan". Her support of the 1992 consensus and minimizing the budget for state's security, apart from her alleged spread of misinformation, were also listed as evidence that amount to unseating.[15] While the votes supporting the recall passed the threshold of 68,578, it was still defeated with 53% of votes against.
Lee Yen-hsiu, the vice secretary-general of Kuomintang, was filed with a recall proposal after supporting various Kuomintang-led proposals, including the controversial legislative reform.[16] The recall was defeated by 57% of votes, despite votes in favor passing the threshold of 77,972.
Lo Chih-chiang was accused of similar breach of national security for his alleged pro-China stance, and his "opportunistic" and "discreditable" past.[17] His recall bid was defeated by 57% of votes, without reaching the threshold of 57,246.
Recall of Lo Chih-chiang
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
56,726
43.13
Against recall
74,808
56.87
Total
131,534
100.00
Valid votes
131,534
99.57
Invalid/blank votes
569
0.43
Total votes
132,103
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
228,981
57.69
NNot recalled
Hsu Chiao-hsin
The civil group that led Hsu Chiao-hsin's recall said she repeatedly used offensive languages and gestures, and was accused of leaking confidential documents concerning foreign relations, manipulating public opinion, and being involved in a fraud case of her family.[18] She remained as lawmaker after 55% voted against her recall, although the supporting ballots passed the threshold of 57,785.
Lai Shyh-bao was alleged to have disrespected the standing order and barred other legislators from joining meetings by blocking the chamber door. He was also accused of assaulting multiple colleagues and supporting his party's proposals that amounted to paralyzing the government.[19] His bid was defeated after only around 40% of votes support the recall, without passing the threshold of 61,189.
Hung Mong-kai, who was elected with the highest number of votes among candidates in the 2024 election, was accused of spreading unconfirmed information. His family was alleged to have close relation with pro-China forces.[20] While he was supported to stay with 56% of votes (and the threshold of 101,265 was not met), Hung admitted that his support dropped massively after losing around 37,000 of the votes he won just a year ago, and agreed to listen to criticisms and advice he heard during the campaign.[21]
Among the other allegations that were raised against other Kuomintang MPs, Yeh Yuan-chih was also said to have been in breach of law after going live at a closed sitting of the Legislative Yuan.[22] Yeh remained as lawmaker after only 48.6% of voters agreed he should be removed despite passing the threshold of 57,761.
Recall of Yeh Yuan-chih
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
63,357
48.63
Against recall
66,917
51.37
Total
130,274
100.00
Valid votes
130,274
99.48
Invalid/blank votes
687
0.52
Total votes
130,961
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
231,042
56.68
NNot recalled
Chang Chih-lun
Chang Chih-lun was said to have gathered wealth by turning public resources for personal gains and colluding with local "tribal" forces. Chang was also alleged to have attempted to buy votes.[23] His recall bid was defeated after only 41% of voters supported it, and votes in favor lagged behind the threshold of 72,073 as well.
Lin Te-fu's recall bid[24] was defeated in a strong support to him after 62% of votes were against, in which the threshold to pass was 59,345.
Recall of Lin Te-fu
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
51,484
38.04
Against recall
83,862
61.96
Total
135,346
100.00
Valid votes
135,346
99.47
Invalid/blank votes
715
0.53
Total votes
136,061
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
237,380
57.32
NNot recalled
Liao Hsien-hsiang
Liao Hsien-hsiang was criticized for attacking other lawmakers during several parliamentary brawls and was indifferent to his constituency's development which was far behind nearby districts.[25] Liao remained as lawmaker after 56% of voters wanted him to stay, while less than 66,561 voters, the threshold of the bid, agreed.
Recall of Liao Hsien-hsiang
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
60,944
43.61
Against recall
78,798
56.39
Total
139,742
100.00
Valid votes
139,742
99.49
Invalid/blank votes
714
0.51
Total votes
140,456
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
266,243
52.75
NNot recalled
Taoyuan
Niu Hsu-ting
Niu Hsu-ting was accused of legislative brawling and slandering DPP supporters.[26] Niu's recall bid was unsuccessful after only 44% cast favorable votes which did not surpass the threshold of 88,517.
Recall of Niu Hsu-ting
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
86,734
44.85
Against recall
106,637
55.15
Total
193,371
100.00
Valid votes
193,371
99.49
Invalid/blank votes
988
0.51
Total votes
194,359
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
354,065
54.89
NNot recalled
Tu Chuan-chi
Critics of Tu Chuan-chi said he objected to agricultural funds that would boost the local economy, in a direct contradiction to his manifesto. Tu was also labelled as destroying the local cultural heritage after voting against Hakka funds.[27] The bid was defeated after only 40% came out in support of it, without reaching the threshold of 79,106.
Lu Ming-che's criticism that the cultural ministry should not solely support the reading culture of teens was listed as one of the motives for his recall bid.[28] He stayed on as member of the Legislative Yuan as only 39% of constituents that voted wanted him to go, also falling behind the threshold of 77,251.
Recall of Lu Ming-che
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
66,301
38.63
Against recall
105,323
61.37
Total
171,624
100.00
Valid votes
171,624
99.55
Invalid/blank votes
771
0.45
Total votes
172,395
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
309,001
55.79
NNot recalled
Wan Mei-ling
Wan Mei-ling was slammed for a multitude of breaches in her manifesto, including cutting the budget concerning Taoyuan's transportation. Wan's support in reforming broadcasting law that was seen as favorable to the pro-China CTi News was also mentioned in the recall bid.[29] Wan failed to be recalled with 57% of votes against. The threshold of recall was 76,672.
Recall of Wan Mei-ling
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
72,626
42.68
Against recall
97,544
57.32
Total
170,170
100.00
Valid votes
170,170
99.52
Invalid/blank votes
825
0.48
Total votes
170,995
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
306,688
55.76
NNot recalled
Lu Yu-lin
Civic groups said Lu Yu-lin obstructed the development of her constituency at Pingzhen and Longtan, even though her husband was a former mayor of Pingzhen and her son was a local councillor.[30] Lu's recall move was defeated in a landslide after less than 38% supported the bid, much behind the threshold of 70,678.
Recall of Lu Yu-lin
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
59,828
37.91
Against recall
97,970
62.09
Total
157,798
100.00
Valid votes
157,798
99.48
Invalid/blank votes
829
0.52
Total votes
158,627
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
282,711
56.11
NNot recalled
Chiu Jo-hua
Chiu Jo-hua's recall attempt secured only 40% of votes, falling behind the threshold of 71,261.[31]
Cheng Cheng-chien was criticised for his relationship with a fraudster, after Cheng was granted a loan from a businesswoman in Taichung in 2017, whom was in turn found guilty for defrauding at least 3,000 individuals.[32] Cheng remained as lawmaker, as more people voted against the recall than in favor, despite the supporting votes passed the threshold of 89,266.
Recall of Cheng Cheng-chien
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
89,970
42.99
Against recall
119,305
57.01
Total
209,275
100.00
Valid votes
209,275
99.33
Invalid/blank votes
1,410
0.67
Total votes
210,685
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
357,063
59.00
NNot recalled
Taichung
Liao Wei-hsiang
Critics of Liao Wei-hsiang said he had frequently taken credits of others' work and had failed to follow his manifesto.[33] Liao's recall bid was defeated with 56% of votes coming out in support of him, while votes supporting the recall came behind the threshold of 84,430.
Recall of Liao Wei-hsiang
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
83,812
44.03
Against recall
106,534
55.97
Total
190,346
100.00
Valid votes
190,346
99.48
Invalid/blank votes
991
0.52
Total votes
191,337
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
337,718
56.66
NNot recalled
Huang Chien-hao
Huang Chien-hao's support to various proposals from his party was labelled as endangering national security and giving in to Chinese influence, including relaxing the restrictions on TikTok.[34] Huang was not recalled, which required 93,857 in support and a majority of yes votes.
Recall of Huang Chien-hao
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
88,914
42.65
Against recall
119,540
57.35
Total
208,454
100.00
Valid votes
208,454
99.53
Invalid/blank votes
976
0.47
Total votes
209,430
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
374,348
55.95
NNot recalled
Lo Ting-wei
Lo Ting-wei was attacked for his "two-faced" wavering stances on several issues in order to win votes.[35] His recall bid failed to secure a majority, although the threshold of 69,359 was reached.
Recall of Lo Ting-wei
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
74,012
46.13
Against recall
86,422
53.87
Total
160,434
100.00
Valid votes
160,434
99.46
Invalid/blank votes
871
0.54
Total votes
161,305
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
277,436
58.14
NNot recalled
Yunlin
Ting Hsueh-chung
Ting Hsueh-chung's recall was defeated without reaching the threshold of 67,916.
Fu Kun-chi, the Majority Leader of the Legislative Yuan, is the most senior Kuomintang member targeted at this round of recall waves, and his recall bid was therefore closely watched. The group that initiated his recall said he, also infamously named "King of Hualien",[36] ignored Hualien constituents, and played an instrumental role for the passage of KMT bills that tears apart a democratic society and provokes polarization. Fu's visit to China was also questioned to be sealing a political deal and was one of the major pieces of evidence pointing to his deep involvement in the pro-Beijing network.[37]
While there had been strong calls campaigning to unseat him, similar to that of Taipei's Wang and Hsu, and that more than the required 47,842 voted in favor of doing so, Fu was backed by more than 65,000 voters and thus defeating the recall bid.
Recall of Fu Kun-chi
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
48,969
42.85
Against recall
65,300
57.15
Total
114,269
100.00
Valid votes
114,269
99.36
Invalid/blank votes
737
0.64
Total votes
115,006
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
191,367
60.10
NNot recalled
Taitung
Huang Chien-pin
Huang Chien-pin's recall attempt failed with less than 38% supporting. The threshold was 28,347.
Mayor of HsinchuAnn Kao also faced removal after she was convicted of corruption and suspended from the position since July 2024. Initially the first TPP member to be elected as a local government head, she left the party after the suspension.[38]
Kao's recall bid fell short of the majority and the threshold of 90,078. Her survival means the ruling DPP will not be able to take hold of Hsinchu.[39]
Recall of Ann Kao
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
86,291
40.96
Against recall
124,360
59.04
Total
210,651
100.00
Valid votes
210,651
99.35
Invalid/blank votes
1,374
0.65
Total votes
212,025
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
360,311
58.84
NNot recalled
23 August: Legislators
During the second round of recall votes, the seven legislators targeted, all KMT members, survived due to votes against the recall exceeding those in favor in every case.
Ma Wen-chun has been alleged to have leaked confidential information regarding a submarine under construction to South Korean embassy, which led to the prosecution of a South Korean technician who was assisting Taipei in the construction.[40] The recall failed without reaching the threshold of 46,039.
Lin Szu-ming was the secretary of the KMT caucus, and was blamed for endorsing multiple party's policies that harmed Taiwan's security. He was also accused of close relationship with private developer tarnished by corruption and employing aides with criminal record.[41] The recall was resoundingly defeated with 70% of no. The threshold was 59,625.
Yen Kuan-heng was petitioned to be recalled following his assault on colleagues and his past criminal records.[42] The recall was defeated without reaching the threshold of 76,936.
Johnny Chiang is the former chairman of Kuomintang and incumbent Vice President of the Legislative Yuan, making him the most senior legislator threatened to lose his seat. The petition said Chiang is unable to uphold the neutrality as the vice-speaker for favouring his party.[44] Chiang's recall was defeated without reaching the threshold of 52,213.
Recall of Johnny Chiang
Choice
Votes
%
Support recall
33,977
32.74
Against recall
69,796
67.26
Total
103,773
100.00
Valid votes
103,773
98.90
Invalid/blank votes
1,151
1.10
Total votes
104,924
100.00
Registered voters/turnout
208,849
50.24
NNot recalled
Aftermath
President Lai Ching-te urged people to accept the results as a demonstration of democracy.[45] Wu Szu-yao, secretary general of DPP's caucus, affirmed that the party's "anti-communist and pro-Taiwan" stance would only be strengthened after the recall bids. Eric Chu, chairman of KMT, thanked voters and called for Lai to apologize and reflect on his own governance.[46]
China said the results of the recall ballots showed the unpopular "political manipulation" by the DPP is completely contrary to the people's will,[46] lambasting the "separatist" DPP as a dictatorship rejected at polls.[47]
The vote was closely watched as it could alter the balance of power. With a resounding victory delivered to the KMT bloc, the "Great Recall" is seen as a blow to Lai Ching-te's government, in addition to dangers of intensifying political polarization as a revenge by Kuomintang members.[3] Analysts considered this as a serious political miscalculation by the DPP and its affiliated groups, after the public is growingly tired of the "anti-China" rhetoric as strategy.[48] The vote could also bring impact not only to domestic affairs, but also to China–US relations.[49]
12Teng, Pei-ju (13 July 2025). "ANALYSIS/Taiwan heads into high-stakes recall showdown that could reshape Legislature". Central News Agency. Retrieved 13 July 2025. For a recall vote to pass, the number of votes in favor of ousting a lawmaker must exceed the number of votes against. The number of votes in favor must also represent at least a quarter of all eligible voters in a given constituency. ... As of now, approximately 100 KMT officials and affiliated individuals have been indicted for document forgery, violations of personal data protection laws and other offenses.