ADPF 153
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name ADPF 153 (Federal Council of the Order of Attorneys of Brazil v. President of the Republic)
Decided29 April 2010
CitationADPF 153
| ADPF 153 | |
|---|---|
| Court | Supreme Federal Court |
| Full case name | ADPF 153 (Federal Council of the Order of Attorneys of Brazil v. President of the Republic) |
| Decided | 29 April 2010 |
| Citation | ADPF 153 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | President
Justices |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Grau |
| Concurrence | Peluzo, Mello, Aurélio, Mendes, Lúcia and Gracie |
| Dissent | Britto and Lewandowski |
| Keywords | |
ADPF 153 was a constitutional review case ruled by the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court, which the Order of Attorneys of Brazil (OAB) requested the acknowledgment of the unconstitutionality of the Amnesty Law. Ruled in April 2010, the Supreme Court considered the case unfounded in a voting of 7 to 2.[1][2]

