The geometric and arithmetic analysis of architecture was a popular subject of 19th-century scholarship, but diminished to a backwater of medieval studies; this book represents something of a revival of the topic,[7] following earlier work in the mid-20th century by Otto von Simson [de].[6] Reviewer Maria Teresa Bartoli writes that this is a problematic area, in part because of ambiguities and contradictions in the way systems of measurements are defined by its investigators.[3] Nevertheless, the subject has been put on a firmer foundation by its investigators' insistence on exact measurements in small units, and a mixture of arithmetic and geometric design principles.[7] The book represents the state of the art for its time in the geometric analysis of medieval architecture.[3][6]
One criticism of reviewer Christian Freigang is that all of the works in this volume assume that mathematical considerations were paramount in the design of these buildings; they do not take into account the use needs of the buildings, or engineering issues such as the designer's experience with different types of stone. Freigang also points to a failure to acknowledge French and German language studies of the same topics, and criticizes as "an outmoded questioning" the consideration of music theory and arithmetic harmony in these design studies.[7] In contrast, Christiane Joost-Gaugier writes that the works in this book clearly show the reverence of medieval architects for the works of Pythagoras and Euclid, and demonstrate "that number, measure, and proportion were used to elucidate ineffable truths in Gothic building programs" and enable them "to form perfect harmonies".[6]
Although the book is heavily illustrated,[4] Bartoli also criticizes it as being difficult to understand in parts because the authors attempt to describe their analyses only in prose, without graphic demonstrations; she calls for an improved description system for the geometric analysis of architecture.[3] Joost-Gaugier takes issue with the technicality of its introduction, and with the "excessive modesty of its index".[6]