Air Carrier Access Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Other short titlesAir Carrier Access Act of 1986
Long titleAn Act to prohibit commercial airlines from discriminating against passengers with disabilities.
Acronyms (colloquial)ACAA
Air Carrier Access Act
Great Seal of the United States
Other short titlesAir Carrier Access Act of 1986
Long titleAn Act to prohibit commercial airlines from discriminating against passengers with disabilities.
Acronyms (colloquial)ACAA
Enacted bythe 99th United States Congress
EffectiveOctober 2, 1986
Citations
Statutes at Large99 Stat. 435
Codification
Acts amendedFederal Aviation Act of 1958
U.S.C. sections created49 U.S.C. § 41705
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the Senate as S. 2703 by Sen. Robert J. Dole (R–KS) on July 30, 1986
  • Committee consideration by Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation; House Public Works and Transportation
  • Passed the Senate on August 15, 1986 (Passed without amendment by voice vote)
  • Passed the House on September 18, 1986 (Passed by voice vote)
  • Signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on October 2, 1986

The Air Carrier Access Act of 1986 (ACAA) is Title 49, Section 41705 of the U.S. Code.

The Act amended the earlier section 404(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (FAA), which was repealed by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. The ACAA prohibits commercial airlines from discriminating against passengers with disabilities. The act was passed by the U.S. Congress in direct response to a narrow interpretation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) v. Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA). In PVA, the Supreme Court held that private, commercial air carriers are not liable under Section 504 because they are not "direct recipients" of federal funding to airports.[1]

Purpose

The Act was construed to contain an implied private right of action. However, in 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Alexander v. Sandoval,[2] which held that federal courts may not find an implied private right unless a statute gives explicit indication that Congress intended to bestow such a right. In 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit followed the lead of the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which relied on the Sandoval decision to hold that the Act can only be enforced by filing an administrative complaint with the DOT.[3][4]

Later developments

Service animals

Notes

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI