Ansley v Prospectus Nominees Unlimited
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name BRUCE ROBIN ANSLEY AND JUSTINE ANN ANSLEY Appellants v PROSPECTUS NOMINEES UNLIMITED Respondent
Decided1 December 2003
Citation[2004] NZCA 14; [2004] 2 NZLR 590; (2004) 5 NZ ConvC 193,914; (2004) 5 NZCPR 330; (2004) 10 TCLR 952 (3 March 2004)
| Ansley v Prospectus Nominees Unlimited | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | BRUCE ROBIN ANSLEY AND JUSTINE ANN ANSLEY Appellants v PROSPECTUS NOMINEES UNLIMITED Respondent |
| Decided | 1 December 2003 |
| Citation | [2004] NZCA 14; [2004] 2 NZLR 590; (2004) 5 NZ ConvC 193,914; (2004) 5 NZCPR 330; (2004) 10 TCLR 952 (3 March 2004) |
| Transcript | Court of Appeal judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Gault P, McGrath J, Anderson J |
Ansley v Prospectus Nominees Unlimited [2004] NZCA 14; [2004] 2 NZLR 590; (2004) 5 NZ ConvC 193,914; (2004) 5 NZCPR 330; (2004) 10 TCLR 952 (3 March 2004) is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether a party to a conditional contract can treat that contract as ended if they are responsible for the failure of the stipulated condition.[1]
