Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation
Decided5 November 2005
Citation(2005) 5 NZCPR 16
| Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation | |
|---|---|
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation |
| Decided | 5 November 2005 |
| Citation | (2005) 5 NZCPR 16 |
| Transcript | Copy of Judgement |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | William Young, O’Regan and Robertson JJ |
Ballance Agri-Nutrients (Kapuni) Ltd v The Gama Foundation (2005) 5 NZCPR 16 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether a nominee stated in a contract is sufficiently designated in order for the Contracts (Privity) Act 1982 to apply. [1]