Because of Him

1946 film by Richard Wallace From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Because of Him is a 1946 American romantic comedy film directed by Richard Wallace and starring Deanna Durbin, Charles Laughton and Franchot Tone.[1]

Directed byRichard Wallace
Screenplay byEdmund Beloin
Story byEdmund Beloin
(original story by)
Sig Herzig
(original story by)
Produced byFelix Jackson
Quick facts Directed by, Screenplay by ...
Because of Him
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRichard Wallace
Screenplay byEdmund Beloin
Story byEdmund Beloin
(original story by)
Sig Herzig
(original story by)
Produced byFelix Jackson
Starring
CinematographyHal Mohr
Edited byTed J. Kent
Music byMiklós Rózsa
Color processBlack and white
Production
company
Distributed byUniversal Pictures
Release date
  • January 18, 1946 (1946-01-18)
Running time
88 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Close

Plot

Kim Walker (Deanna Durbin) is an ambitious waitress who dreams of being on the stage. She tricks respected stage actor John Sheridan (Charles Laughton) into signing a letter of introduction. Thanks to the forged letter, Kim then wins the role of Sheridan's co-star in his next play, much to the disgust of the writer Paul Taylor (Franchot Tone).

Cast

Production

In February 1945 Universal announced that Deanna Durbin and Charles Laughton, who had previously appeared together in It Started with Eve, would be reunited in Catherine the Last, "a contemporary comedy-drama with music". It would be filmed before Merry Merry Marriage recently announced for Dubin.[2] In May Richard Wallace signed to direct.[3]

Franchot Tone, who had appeared opposite Durbin twice before, was signed in August 1945, when the title was changed to Because of Him. Filming started August 15, 1945.[4]

Durbin had married the producer Felix Jackson in June 1945 and at the time of filming, she was pregnant with her first child.[5]

Reception

The New York Times called it "an utterly pointless fable".[6]

Durbin and Jackson later said "We thought that picture came closest to the so-called old-style Durbin story. Yet the New York critics gave us very bad notices. We don't know why."[7]

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI