Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation

2022 United States Supreme Court case From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation, For Valley Hospital Medical Center, 597 U.S. 424 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified which patients hospitals are allowed to be reimbursed by Medicare for treating, and at what rate.[1]:1 In a 54 opinion written by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court held that "in calculating the Medicare fraction, individuals "entitled to [Medicare Part A] benefits" are all those qualifying for the program, regardless of whether they receive Medicare payments for part or all of a hospital stay."[1]:2[2]

Full case nameBecerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Empire Health Foundation, For Valley Hospital Medical Center
Docket no.20-1312
Citations597 U.S. 424 (more)
597 U. S. 424 (2022)
Prior958 F. 3d 873 (CA9 2020)
Quick facts Argued November 29, 2021 Decided June 24, 2022, Full case name ...
Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation, For Valley Hospital Medical Center
Argued November 29, 2021
Decided June 24, 2022
Full case nameBecerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Empire Health Foundation, For Valley Hospital Medical Center
Docket no.20-1312
Citations597 U.S. 424 (more)
597 U. S. 424 (2022)
Case history
Prior958 F. 3d 873 (CA9 2020)
Holding
In calculating the Medicare fraction, individuals entitled to Medicare Part A benefits are all those qualifying for the program, regardless of whether they receive Medicare payments for part or all of a hospital stay.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
MajorityKagan, joined by Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, Barrett
DissentKavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch
Laws applied
42 U.S.C. § 1395
Close

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Elena Kagan authored the majority opinion of the Court, which reversed the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and remanded the case to that court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.[1]:1,4[2]

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI