Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd
Decided9 December 1993
Citation[1994] 3 NZLR 189
| Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd |
| Decided | 9 December 1993 |
| Citation | [1994] 3 NZLR 189 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Casey P, Hardie Boys J, Gallen J |
Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd [1994] 3 NZLR 189 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the interpretation of express terms of a contract.[1] Express terms must be given their plain meaning and extrinsic evidence (i.e. background matters) is not able to be considered, unless such terms are uncertain or ambiguous.