Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Full case name Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd
Decided9 December 1993
Citation[1994] 3 NZLR 189
Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd
CourtCourt of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case name Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd
Decided9 December 1993
Citation[1994] 3 NZLR 189
Court membership
Judges sittingCasey P, Hardie Boys J, Gallen J

Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd [1994] 3 NZLR 189 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the interpretation of express terms of a contract.[1] Express terms must be given their plain meaning and extrinsic evidence (i.e. background matters) is not able to be considered, unless such terms are uncertain or ambiguous.

Held

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI