Binge v. Smith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name William H. Binge & James Blair v. Sampson Smith
Decided1844
CitationsDallam 616 (1844); 1844 WL 3886 (Tex.Rep.Sup.)
| Binge v. Smith | |
|---|---|
| Court | Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas |
| Full case name | William H. Binge & James Blair v. Sampson Smith |
| Decided | 1844 |
| Citations | Dallam 616 (1844); 1844 WL 3886 (Tex.Rep.Sup.) |
| Holding | |
| That where one party to a joint contract dies, the survivor may be sued; that the drawer and indorser of a promissory note may and should be joined in the same action if both be sued simultaneously; and that where separate actions were brought at different terms in the same court, plaintiff might be required to consolidate unless manifest injustice would thereby be done. | |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | John Hemphill, R. E. B. Baylor, Patrick C. Jack, William E. Jones, William J. Jones, Richard Morris, William B. Ochiltree |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Wm. J. Jones |
| Concurrence | Morris, joined by Baylor |
Binge v. Smith, Dallam 616 (1844), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas which held that where one party to a joint contract dies, the survivor may be sued; that the drawer and indorser of a promissory note may and should be joined in the same action if both be sued simultaneously; and that where separate actions were brought at different terms in the same court, plaintiff might be required to consolidate unless manifest injustice would thereby be done.