British Motor Syndicate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Company typePublic Listed Company
IndustryAutomotive
FoundedJuly 1895 (1895-07) in London, England[1]
Founders
The British Motor Syndicate Limited
Company typePublic Listed Company
IndustryAutomotive
FoundedJuly 1895 (1895-07) in London, England[1]
Founders
Headquarters59, Holborn Viaduct, E.C.,
London
,
England
ServicesFarming of patent rights

The British Motor Syndicate Limited (BMS) was a company formed in November 1895[2] by company promoter and entrepreneur Harry John Lawson. Lawson's aim was to use BMS to raise funds from the public to establish a business with a monopoly on petrol-driven cars by acquiring as many patents as possible related to such vehicles[3] from Gottlieb Daimler, his business associates, and other sources.[4][5]

Turrell-Bollée by subsidiary
The Coventry Motor Company

It was never the company's intention to produce motor cars, but rather to exploit the patents it had purchased by charging substantial royalties to automobile manufacturers for the right to manufacture cars using those patents.[6]

By the time of the first public issue, twelve months after incorporation, the following patent holders had committed themselves to BMS:

Léon Bollée 1898

and BMS had received more than £200,000 from English motor car manufacturers, leading names were Lawson's Daimler and Great Horseless.[5]

Directors

Directors at the time of flotation, November 1896:

Prince Ranjitsinhji Maharaja Jam Sahib of Navanagar

Commercial manager: Herbert Osbaldeston Duncan

Brokers: Ernest T Hooley, Chapman & Rowe
Consulting Engineer: Frederick R. Simms[5]

Educated opinions of the float

The Economist was reported by the Coventry Herald as saying that the public might judge for themselves if reasonable dividends could be earned on the inflated amount of the syndicate's capital. Furthermore "the publication [of the prospectus] has been followed by a chorus of repudiations" from those said to be connected with the syndicate, one way or another. In the opinion of The Economist the syndicate would be unable to bar the way to the industry's progress by insisting on exorbitant royalties.[7]

Activities

Collapse

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI