The poem is 19 quatrains of alexandrines with an ABAB rhyme scheme (rimes croisées). Twelve of these stanzas are spoken by the poet's mother, the poet's wife, or the poet himself; the other seven are in the third person.
Bénédiction is often read in conjunction with Correspondances and Élévation, two of the three poems which follow, as the first episode in a mystical progress of the Poet towards a lost paradise,[2] dimly remembered through poetic inspiration. The "monde ennuyé" ("bored world") of the first line has further rapport with Au Lecteur, where Ennui is personified as the "ugliest, filthiest, most wicked vice," who "dreams of the scaffold while smoking his hookah."[3]
Baudelaire's feelings towards his own mother, Caroline, were intense and ambivalent. His early life he described, with intense nostalgia, as an "innocent paradise"[4] characterized by "a period of passionate love" for his mother.[5] Though they remained close throughout his life, Baudelaire's debts and his Bohemian lifestyle, particularly his relationship with Jeanne Duval, caused their relationship to become tense. The epithet "maternal," for Baudelaire, often represents something petty and animalistic, as in his correspondence where he describes credit as "this maternal invention of a mind too preoccupied with money!"[6]
The first lines of the poem have been interpreted as a perverse recasting of the Annunciation, where there is no mystery for the mother surrounding the conception of the child ("Cursed be the night of ephemeral pleasures..."), and where no permission is asked by the Holy Spirit.[7]
The poem contributes to the problem of theodicy through its attribution of redemptive power to the Poet's suffering.[7] Some studies have examined the element of fate.[6]
Critical estimation of Bénédiction suffered in the twentieth century, where Baudelaire's later realist poetics were upheld at the expense of poems representative of his Romantic mode, of which this provides one of the most exaggerated examples. Wallace Stevens considered it the weakest poem in the collection because of its stilted style and self-conscious poeticality.[8] Literary theorist Leo Bersani characterized it as one of "Baudelaire's most famous, and least interesting, poems."[9]