Wikiwand AI

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue

2011 United States Supreme Court case From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CSX Transp., Inc. v. Ala. Dept. of Revenue, 562 U.S. 277 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a railroad can challenge state's sales and use taxes as discriminatory under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 when the tax in question is imposed on railroads but not their main competitors.[1][2]

Full case nameCSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
Citations562 U.S. 277 (more)
MajorityKagan, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor
DissentThomas, joined by Ginsburg
Quick facts Decided February 22, 2011, Full case name ...
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Ala. Dept. of Revenue
Decided February 22, 2011
Full case nameCSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
Citations562 U.S. 277 (more)
Holding
A railroad can challenge state's sales and use taxes as discriminatory under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 when the tax in question is imposed on railroads but not their main competitors
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKagan, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor
DissentThomas, joined by Ginsburg
Laws applied
Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976
Close

Background

CSX is an interstate rail carrier that operates, and pays taxes, in Alabama. Alabama imposes sales and use taxes on railroads when they purchase or consume diesel fuel, but exempts their main competitors—interstate motor and water carriers. CSX sued the Alabama Department of Revenue and its Commissioner (Alabama), claiming that this tax scheme discriminates against railroads in violation of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4–R Act), which bars four forms of discriminatory taxation in 49 U.S.C. §11501(b). Three of the delineated prohibitions deal with property taxes, and the fourth is a catch-all provision that forbids a State to "[i]mpose another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier". The federal District Court dismissed CSX's suit as not cognizable under the 4–R Act on the basis of the Supreme Court's decision in Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc., 510 U. S. 332, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.[1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on February 22, 2011.[1]

Later developments

In 2015, the case returned to the Supreme Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc..

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks