Charles S. Rhyne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Born
Charles Sylvanus Rhyne

(1912-06-23)23 June 1912
Died27 July 2003(2003-07-27) (aged 91)
OccupationLawyer
Charles S. Rhyne
Born
Charles Sylvanus Rhyne

(1912-06-23)23 June 1912
Died27 July 2003(2003-07-27) (aged 91)
EducationDuke University
George Washington University
OccupationLawyer
Known forBaker v. Carr
Spouse(s)Sue M. Cotton (d. 1974); Sarah P. Hendon
Children4

Charles Sylvanus Rhyne (23 June 1912 – 27 July 2003) was an American lawyer whose arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States led to the landmark 1962 decision in Baker v. Carr.[1][2][3]

Rhyne was born on a cotton farm near Charlotte, North Carolina. He attended Duke University and its law school, where befriended classmate and future president Richard Nixon. Rhyne completed his legal education at George Washington University in Washington, D.C..[2] Before his legal career, he worked as a cowboy and prizefighter during the Great Depression.[1]

Rhyne opened a law office in Washington, D.C. in 1937, developing a practice that focussed on aeronautical and municipal law. He became president of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia in 1955 and promoted its racial integration. In 1958, Rhyne was elected president of the American Bar Association, where he initiated the annual celebration of Law Day on May 1.[2][3]

Baker v. Carr

Rhyne played a central role in the landmark Baker v. Carr case, which transformed American electoral law. In the late 1950s, a group of urban voters in Tennessee challenged the state’s failure to redraw its legislative districts. The electoral boundaries of the districts had not changed since 1901 despite significant population growth in cities.[1] Rhyne, then general counsel to the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, agreed to represent them in their case against Tennessee Secretary of State Joseph Carr.[1]

Arguing that the outdated apportionment diluted urban votes and violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, Rhyne persuaded the Supreme Court to hear the case in 1961.[1] On 26 March 1962, the Court ruled 6–2 in favor of the plaintiffs, establishing that federal courts had jurisdiction over redistricting disputes. This decision led to widespread redrawing of electoral maps in the United States.[2][1]

The then Chief Justice Earl Warren described the decision as one of the most significant of his tenure.[1][3]

Later life and death

See also

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI