Computational complexity of mathematical operations

The following tables list the computational complexity of various algorithms for common mathematical operations.

Here, complexity refers to the time complexity of performing computations on a multitape Turing machine.^[1] See big O notation for an explanation of the notation used.

Note: Due to the variety of multiplication algorithms, $M(n)$ below stands in for the complexity of the chosen multiplication algorithm.

Arithmetic functions

This table lists the complexity of mathematical operations on integers.

More information Two

...

Operation	Input	Output	Algorithm	Complexity
Addition	Two $n$ -digit numbers	One $n+1$ -digit number	Schoolbook addition with carry	$O{\mathord {\left(n\right)}}$
Subtraction	Two $n$ -digit numbers	One $n$ -digit number	Schoolbook subtraction with borrow	$O{\mathord {\left(n\right)}}$
Multiplication	Two $n$ -digit numbers	One $2n$ -digit number	Schoolbook long multiplication	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2}\right)}}$
			Karatsuba algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{1.585}\right)}}$
			3-way Toom–Cook multiplication	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{1.465}\right)}}$
			$k$ -way Toom–Cook multiplication	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{\frac {\log(2k-1)}{\log k}}\right)}}$
			Mixed-level Toom–Cook (Knuth 4.3.3-T)^[2]	$O{\mathord {\left(n\,2^{\sqrt {2\log n}}\,\log n\right)}}$
			Schönhage–Strassen algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n\log n\log \log n\right)}}$
			Harvey-Hoeven algorithm^[3]^[4]	$O(n\log n)$
Division	Two $n$ -digit numbers	One $n$ -digit number	Schoolbook long division	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2}\right)}}$
			Burnikel–Ziegler Divide-and-Conquer Division^[5]	$O(M(n)\log n)$
			Newton–Raphson division	$O(M(n))$
Square root	One $n$ -digit number	One $n/2$ -digit number	Newton's method	$O(M(n))$
Modular exponentiation	Two $n$ -digit integers and a $k$ -bit exponent	One $n$ -digit integer	Repeated multiplication and reduction	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)\,2^{k}\right)}}$
			Exponentiation by squaring	$O(M(n)\,k)$
			Exponentiation with Montgomery reduction	$O(M(n)\,k)$

Close

On stronger computational models, specifically a pointer machine and consequently also a unit-cost random-access machine it is possible to multiply two $n$ -bit numbers in time O(n).^[6]

Algebraic functions

Here we consider operations over polynomials and $n$ denotes their degree; for the coefficients we use a unit-cost model, ignoring the number of bits in a number. In practice this means that we assume them to be machine integers. For this section $M(n)$ indicates the time needed for multiplying two polynomials of degree at most $n$ .^[7]^: 242

More information One polynomial of degree

...

Operation	Input	Output	Algorithm	Complexity
Polynomial evaluation	One polynomial of degree $n$ with integer coefficients	One number	Direct evaluation	$\Theta (n)$
Polynomial evaluation	One polynomial of degree $n$ with integer coefficients	One number	Horner's method	$\Theta (n)$
Polynomial multipoint evaluation	One polynomial of degree less than $n$ with integer coefficients and $n$ numbers as evaluation points	$n$ numbers	Direct evaluation	$\Theta (n^{2})$
Polynomial multipoint evaluation		$n$ numbers	Fast multipoint evaluation^[7]^: 295	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Polynomial gcd (over $\mathbb {Z} [x]$ or $F[x]$ )	Two polynomials of degree $n$ with integer coefficients	One polynomial of degree at most $n$	Euclidean algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2}\right)}}$
Polynomial gcd (over $\mathbb {Z} [x]$ or $F[x]$ )	Two polynomials of degree $n$ with integer coefficients	One polynomial of degree at most $n$	Fast Euclidean algorithm^[7]^: 318 (Lehmer^[7]^: 324)	$O(M(n)\log n)$

Close

Special functions

Many of the methods in this section are given in Borwein & Borwein.^[8]

Elementary functions

The elementary functions are constructed by composing arithmetic operations, the exponential function ( $\exp$ ), the natural logarithm ( $\log$ ), trigonometric functions ( $\sin ,\cos$ ), and their inverses. The complexity of an elementary function is equivalent to that of its inverse, since all elementary functions are analytic and hence invertible by means of Newton's method. In particular, if either $\exp$ or $\log$ in the complex domain can be computed with some complexity, then that complexity is attainable for all other elementary functions.

Below, the size $n$ refers to the number of digits of precision at which the function is to be evaluated.

More information ; repeated argument reduction (e.g.

...

Algorithm	Applicability	Complexity
Taylor series; repeated argument reduction (e.g. $\exp(2x)=[\exp(x)]^{2}$ ) and direct summation	$\exp ,\log ,\sin ,\cos ,\arctan$	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)n^{1/2}\right)}}$
Taylor series; FFT-based acceleration	$\exp ,\log ,\sin ,\cos ,\arctan$	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)n^{1/3}(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$
Taylor series; binary splitting + bit-burst algorithm^[9]	$\exp ,\log ,\sin ,\cos ,\arctan$	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$
Arithmetic–geometric mean iteration^[10]	$\exp ,\log ,\sin ,\cos ,\arctan$	$O(M(n)\log n)$

Close

It is not known whether $O(M(n)\log n)$ is the optimal complexity for elementary functions. The best known lower bound is the trivial bound $\Omega$ $(M(n))$ .

Non-elementary functions

More information Integer

...

Function	Input	Algorithm	Complexity
Gamma function	Integer $n$	Series approximation of the incomplete gamma function	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)n^{1/2}(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$
	Fixed rational number	Hypergeometric series	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$
	$m/24$ , for $m$ integer.	Arithmetic-geometric mean iteration	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Hypergeometric function ${}_{p}\!F_{q}$	$n$ -digit number	(As described in Borwein & Borwein)	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)n^{1/2}(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$
Hypergeometric function ${}_{p}\!F_{q}$	Fixed rational number	Hypergeometric series	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$

Close

Mathematical constants

This table gives the complexity of computing approximations to the given constants to $n$ correct digits.

More information ,

...

Constant	Algorithm	Complexity
Golden ratio, $\phi$	Newton's method	$O(M(n))$
Square root of 2, ${\sqrt {2}}$	Newton's method	$O(M(n))$
Euler's number, $e$	Binary splitting of the Taylor series for the exponential function	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Euler's number, $e$	Newton inversion of the natural logarithm	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Pi, $\pi$	Binary splitting of the arctan series in Machin's formula	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$ ^[11]
Pi, $\pi$	Gauss–Legendre algorithm	$O(M(n)\log n)$ ^[11]
Euler's constant, $\gamma$	Sweeney's method (approximation in terms of the exponential integral)	$O{\mathord {\left(M(n)(\log n)^{2}\right)}}$

Close

Number theory

Algorithms for number theoretical calculations are studied in computational number theory.

More information Two

...

Operation	Input	Output	Algorithm	Complexity
Greatest common divisor	Two $n$ -digit integers	One integer with at most $n$ digits	Euclidean algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2}\right)}}$
			Binary GCD algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2}\right)}}$
			Left/right k-ary binary GCD algorithm^[12]	$O{\mathord {\left({\frac {n^{2}}{\log n}}\right)}}$
			Stehlé–Zimmermann algorithm^[13]	$O(M(n)\log n)$
			Schönhage controlled Euclidean descent algorithm^[14]	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Jacobi symbol	Two $n$ -digit integers	$0$ , $-1$ or $1$	Schönhage controlled Euclidean descent algorithm^[15]	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Jacobi symbol	Two $n$ -digit integers	$0$ , $-1$ or $1$	Stehlé–Zimmermann algorithm^[16]	$O(M(n)\log n)$
Factorial	A positive integer less than $m$	One $O(m\log m)$ -digit integer	Bottom-up multiplication	$O{\mathord {\left(M\left(m^{2}\right)\log m\right)}}$
			Binary splitting	$O(M(m\log m)\log m)$
			Exponentiation of the prime factors of $m$	$O(M(m\log m)\log \log m)$ ,^[17] $O(M(m\log m))$ ^[1]
Primality test	A $n$ -digit integer	True or false	AKS primality test	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{6+o(1)}\right)}}$ ^[18]^[19] $O(n^{3})$ , assuming Agrawal's conjecture
			Elliptic curve primality proving	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{4+\varepsilon }\right)}}$ heuristically^[20]
			Baillie–PSW primality test	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2+\varepsilon }\right)}}$ ^[21]^[22]
			Miller–Rabin primality test	$O{\mathord {\left(kn^{2+\varepsilon }\right)}}$ ^[23]
			Solovay–Strassen primality test	$O{\mathord {\left(kn^{2+\varepsilon }\right)}}$ ^[23]
Integer factorization	A $b$ -bit input integer	A set of factors	General number field sieve	$O{\mathord {\left((1+\varepsilon )^{b}\right)}}$ ^{[nb 1]}
Integer factorization	A $b$ -bit input integer	A set of factors	Shor's algorithm	$O(M(b)b)$ , on a quantum computer

Close

Matrix algebra

The following complexity figures assume that arithmetic with individual elements has complexity O(1), as is the case with fixed-precision floating-point arithmetic or operations on a finite field.

More information Two

...

Operation	Input	Output	Algorithm	Complexity
Matrix multiplication	Two $n\times n$ matrices	One $n\times n$ matrix	Schoolbook matrix multiplication	$O(n^{3})$
			Strassen algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2.807}\right)}}$
			Coppersmith–Winograd algorithm (galactic algorithm)	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2.376}\right)}}$
			Optimized CW-like algorithms^[24]^[25]^[26]^[27] (galactic algorithms)	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{\psi =2.3728596}\right)}}$
	One $n\times m$ matrix, and one $m\times p$ matrix	One $n\times p$ matrix	Schoolbook matrix multiplication	$O(nmp)$
	One $n\times \left\lceil n^{k}\right\rceil$ matrix, and one $\left\lceil n^{k}\right\rceil \times n$ matrix, for some $k\geq 0$	One $n\times n$ matrix	Algorithms given in ^[28]	$O(n^{\omega (k)+\epsilon })$ , where upper bounds on $\omega (k)$ are given in ^[28]
Matrix inversion	One $n\times n$ matrix	One $n\times n$ matrix	Gauss–Jordan elimination	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{3}\right)}}$
			Strassen algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2.807}\right)}}$
			Coppersmith–Winograd algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2.376}\right)}}$
			Fast matrix multiplication algorithms	$O({n^{\omega }})$ for $~2.37\leq \omega <3$ ^[29]^{, Sect. 11, pp. 413-414}.
Singular value decomposition	One $m\times n$ matrix	One $m\times m$ matrix, one $m\times n$ matrix, & one $n\times n$ matrix	Bidiagonalization and QR algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(m^{2}n\right)}}$ ( $m\geq n$ )
Singular value decomposition	One $m\times n$ matrix	One $m\times n$ matrix, one $n\times n$ matrix, & one $n\times n$ matrix	Bidiagonalization and QR algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(mn^{2}\right)}}$ ( $m\leq n$ )
QR decomposition	One $m\times n$ matrix	One $m\times n$ matrix, & one $n\times n$ matrix	Algorithms in ^[30] by fast matrix multiplication	$O{\mathord {\left(mn^{1+{\frac {1}{4-\omega }}}\right)}}$ ( $m\geq n$ )
Determinant	One $n\times n$ matrix	One number	Laplace expansion	$O(n!)$
			Division-free algorithm^[31]	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{4}\right)}}$ $O{\mathord {\left(n^{2.697263}\right)}}$ ^[32]
			LU decomposition	$O(n^{3})$
			Bareiss algorithm	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{3}\right)}}$
			Fast matrix multiplication^[33]	$O({n^{\omega }})$
Back substitution	Triangular matrix	$n$ solutions	Back substitution^[34]	$O{\mathord {\left(n^{2}\right)}}$
Characteristic polynomial	One $n\times n$ matrix	One degree- $n$ polynomial	Faddeev-LeVerrier algorithm	$O(n^{\psi +1})$
			Samuelson-Berkowitz algorithm	$O(n^{\psi +1})$ (smaller constant factor)
			Preparata-Sarwate algorithm^[35]^[36]	$O(n^{\psi +1/2}+n^{3})$
			By fast matrix multiplication^[37]	$O({n^{\omega }})$

Close

In 2005, Henry Cohn, Robert Kleinberg, Balázs Szegedy, and Chris Umans showed that either of two different conjectures would imply that the exponent of matrix multiplication is 2.^[38]

Transforms

Algorithms for computing transforms of functions (particularly integral transforms) are widely used in all areas of mathematics, particularly analysis and signal processing.

More information Finite data sequence of size

...

Operation	Input	Output	Algorithm	Complexity
Discrete Fourier transform	Finite data sequence of size $n$	Set of complex numbers	Schoolbook	$O(n^{2})$
Discrete Fourier transform	Finite data sequence of size $n$	Set of complex numbers	Fast Fourier transform	$O(n\log n)$

Close

Notes

[1]
This form of sub-exponential time is valid for all $\varepsilon >0$ . A more precise form of the complexity can be given as $O{\mathord {\left(\exp {\sqrt[{3}]{{\frac {64}{9}}b(\log b)^{2}}}\right)}}.$

References

[1]
Schönhage, A.; Grotefeld, A.F.W.; Vetter, E. (1994). Fast Algorithms—A Multitape Turing Machine Implementation. BI Wissenschafts-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-411-16891-0. OCLC 897602049.
[2]
Knuth 1997
[3]
Harvey, D.; Van Der Hoeven, J. (2021). "Integer multiplication in time O (n log n)" (PDF). Annals of Mathematics. 193 (2): 563–617. doi:10.4007/annals.2021.193.2.4. S2CID 109934776.
[4]
Klarreich, Erica (December 2019). "Multiplication hits the speed limit". Commun. ACM. 63 (1): 11–13. doi:10.1145/3371387. S2CID 209450552.
[5]
Burnikel, Christoph; Ziegler, Joachim (1998). Fast Recursive Division. Forschungsberichte des Max-Planck-Instituts für Informatik. Saarbrücken: MPI Informatik Bibliothek & Dokumentation. OCLC 246319574. MPII-98-1-022.
[6]
Schönhage, Arnold (1980). "Storage Modification Machines". SIAM Journal on Computing. 9 (3): 490–508. doi:10.1137/0209036.
[7]
von zur Gathen, J.; Gerhard, J. (2013). Modern Computer Algebra (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139856065.
[8]
Borwein, J.; Borwein, P. (1987). Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-83138-9. OCLC 755165897.
[9]
Chudnovsky, David; Chudnovsky, Gregory (1988). "Approximations and complex multiplication according to Ramanujan". Ramanujan revisited: Proceedings of the Centenary Conference. Academic Press. pp. 375–472. ISBN 978-0-01-205856-5.
[10]
Brent, Richard P. (2014) [1975]. "Multiple-precision zero-finding methods and the complexity of elementary function evaluation". In Traub, J.F. (ed.). Analytic Computational Complexity. Elsevier. pp. 151–176. arXiv:1004.3412. ISBN 978-1-4832-5789-1.
[11]
Richard P. Brent (2020), The Borwein Brothers, Pi and the AGM, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol. 313, arXiv:1802.07558, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36568-4, ISBN 978-3-030-36567-7, S2CID 214742997
[12]
Sorenson, J. (1994). "Two Fast GCD Algorithms". Journal of Algorithms. 16 (1): 110–144. doi:10.1006/jagm.1994.1006.
[13]
Crandall, R.; Pomerance, C. (2005). "Algorithm 9.4.7 (Stehlé-Zimmerman binary-recursive-gcd)". Prime Numbers – A Computational Perspective (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 471–3. ISBN 978-0-387-28979-3.
[14]
Möller N (2008). "On Schönhage's algorithm and subquadratic integer gcd computation" (PDF). Mathematics of Computation. 77 (261): 589–607. Bibcode:2008MaCom..77..589M. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-07-02017-0.
[15]
Bernstein, D.J. "Faster Algorithms to Find Non-squares Modulo Worst-case Integers".
[16]
Brent, Richard P.; Zimmermann, Paul (2010). "An $O(M(n)\log n)$ algorithm for the Jacobi symbol". International Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium. Springer. pp. 83–95. arXiv:1004.2091. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14518-6_10. ISBN 978-3-642-14518-6. S2CID 7632655.
[17]
Borwein, P. (1985). "On the complexity of calculating factorials". Journal of Algorithms. 6 (3): 376–380. doi:10.1016/0196-6774(85)90006-9.
[18]
Lenstra jr., H.W.; Pomerance, Carl (2019). "Primality testing with Gaussian periods" (PDF). Journal of the European Mathematical Society. 21 (4): 1229–69. doi:10.4171/JEMS/861. hdl:21.11116/0000-0005-717D-0.
[19]
Tao, Terence (2010). "1.11 The AKS primality test". An epsilon of room, II: Pages from year three of a mathematical blog. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 117. American Mathematical Society. pp. 82–86. doi:10.1090/gsm/117. ISBN 978-0-8218-5280-4. MR 2780010.
[20]
Morain, F. (2007). "Implementing the asymptotically fast version of the elliptic curve primality proving algorithm". Mathematics of Computation. 76 (257): 493–505. arXiv:math/0502097. Bibcode:2007MaCom..76..493M. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-06-01890-4. MR 2261033. S2CID 133193.
[21]
Pomerance, Carl; Selfridge, John L.; Wagstaff, Jr., Samuel S. (July 1980). "The pseudoprimes to 25·10⁹" (PDF). Mathematics of Computation. 35 (151): 1003–26. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572872-7. JSTOR 2006210.
[22]
Baillie, Robert; Wagstaff, Jr., Samuel S. (October 1980). "Lucas Pseudoprimes" (PDF). Mathematics of Computation. 35 (152): 1391–1417. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0583518-6. JSTOR 2006406. MR 0583518.
[23]
Monier, Louis (1980). "Evaluation and comparison of two efficient probabilistic primality testing algorithms". Theoretical Computer Science. 12 (1): 97–108. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(80)90007-9. MR 0582244.
[24]
Alman, Josh; Williams, Virginia Vassilevska (2020), "A Refined Laser Method and Faster Matrix Multiplication", 32nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2021), pp. 522–539, arXiv:2010.05846, doi:10.1137/1.9781611976465.32, ISBN 978-1-61197-646-5, S2CID 222290442
[25]
Davie, A.M.; Stothers, A.J. (2013), "Improved bound for complexity of matrix multiplication", Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 143A (2): 351–370, doi:10.1017/S0308210511001648, S2CID 113401430
[26]
Vassilevska Williams, Virginia (2014), Breaking the Coppersmith-Winograd barrier: Multiplying matrices in O(n^2.373) time
[27]
Le Gall, François (2014), "Powers of tensors and fast matrix multiplication", Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation — ISSAC '14, p. 23, arXiv:1401.7714, Bibcode:2014arXiv1401.7714L, doi:10.1145/2608628.2627493, ISBN 9781450325011, S2CID 353236
[28]
Le Gall, François; Urrutia, Floren (2018). "Improved Rectangular Matrix Multiplication using Powers of the Coppersmith-Winograd Tensor". In Czumaj, Artur (ed.). Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. doi:10.1137/1.9781611975031.67. ISBN 978-1-61197-503-1. S2CID 33396059.
[29]
Pan, V. (1984). "How can we speed up matrix multiplication?". SIAM Review. 26 (3): 393–415. doi:10.1137/1026076.
[30]
Knight, Philip A. (May 1995). "Fast rectangular matrix multiplication and QR decomposition". Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 221: 69–81. doi:10.1016/0024-3795(93)00230-w. ISSN 0024-3795.
[31]
Rote, G. (2001). "Division-free algorithms for the determinant and the pfaffian: algebraic and combinatorial approaches" (PDF). Computational discrete mathematics. Springer. pp. 119–135. ISBN 3-540-45506-X.
[32]
Kaltofen, Erich; Villard, Gilles (2005). "On the complexity of computing determinants". Computational Complexity. 13 (3–4): 91–130. doi:10.1007/s00037-004-0185-3.
[33]
Bunch, James R.; Hopcroft, John E. (1974). "Triangular Factorization and Inversion by Fast Matrix Multiplication". Mathematics of Computation. 28 (125): 231–236. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1974-0331751-8.
[34]
Fraleigh, J.B.; Beauregard, R.A. (1987). Linear Algebra (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-201-15459-7.
[35]
Preparata, F.P.; Sarwate, D.V. (April 1978). "An improved parallel processor bound in fast matrix inversion". Information Processing Letters. 7 (3): 148–150. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(78)90079-0.
[36]
Galil, Zvi; Pan, Victor (January 16, 1989). "Parallel evaluation of the determinant and of the inverse of a matrix". Information Processing Letters. 30 (1): 148–150. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(89)90173-7., in which the $O(n^{3})$ term is reduced
[37]
Neiger, Vincent; Pernet, Clément (December 2021). "Deterministic computation of the characteristic polynomial in the time of matrix multiplication". Journal of Complexity. 67. arXiv:2010.04662. doi:10.1016/j.jco.2021.101572.
[38]
Cohn, Henry; Kleinberg, Robert; Szegedy, Balazs; Umans, Chris (2005). "Group-theoretic Algorithms for Matrix Multiplication". Proceedings of the 46th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE. pp. 379–388. arXiv:math.GR/0511460. doi:10.1109/SFCS.2005.39. ISBN 0-7695-2468-0. S2CID 6429088.

Computational complexity of mathematical operations

Arithmetic functions

Algebraic functions

Special functions

Elementary functions

Non-elementary functions

Mathematical constants

Number theory

Matrix algebra

Transforms

Notes

References

Further reading

Related Articles