Draft:Academic risk-taking
A concept in education research
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In psychology, the term Academic risk-taking refers to students' willing engagement with challenging academic tasks while experiencing uncertainy about the correctness or quality of their response.[1][2]. The risk stems from the possibility of a negative educational or social consequence, such as experiencing an academic failure or appearing less competent compared to others.[3][4]. Examples include contributing novel ideas to class discussions, submitting creative work for feedback, or expressing dissenting viewpoints in academic debates. Academic risk-taking was first described by psychologists as calculated engagement with learning tasks based on learners’ reasoning about their probability for success[5]. This early definition has been critiqued as too reductionist and mechanistic in that it assumes learners’ actions are premised on rational decision making, and for failing to consider social, cultural, and contextual factors that affect academic risk taking[6],[7]. Researchers sometimes refer to academic risk-taking as intellectual risk-taking, citing the same foundational research and describing the construct in a parallel way[8].
| Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,367 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 30 December 2025 by GTrang (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
| Submission declined on 12 December 2025 by WeirdNAnnoyed (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by WeirdNAnnoyed 3 months ago.
|
| Submission declined on 22 October 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft reads like an essay or opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions. The draft should:
Declined by Pythoncoder 4 months ago.
|
| Submission declined on 8 August 2025 by 11wallisb (talk). This draft reads like an essay or opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions. The draft should:
Declined by 11wallisb 7 months ago.
|
| Submission declined on 26 May 2025 by Tarlby (talk). This draft reads like an essay or opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions. The draft should:
Declined by Tarlby 9 months ago.
|
Comment: I think this article is non-notable per WP:DICTDEF. The sources I reviewed seem to use the term in slightly different ways, suggesting this isn't a single cohesive topic, unless more sources could be found (ideally secondary sources as most sources cited are primary). The article also needs some general editing: Both entries in the list are numbered 1, the title of Ref. 3 is incorrect, and so on. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:52, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment: There has been little done to differentiate draft from an essay. This draft is not currently written or referenced like a Wikipedia article. Several paragraphs are also unsourced. 11WB (talk) 01:34, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Correlates
Studies in educational research have identified various variables that influence academic risk-taking:
- Individual characteristics: Student's beliefs about errors[9], goal orientations[10], and a preference for effortful thinking[11] can affect their willingness to take academic risks. Learners with mastery-oriented goals or a positive view of mistakes are more likely to engage in challenging tasks, while those with performance-avoidant orientations tend to avoid them.
- Didactic design: Teaching methods emphasizing memorization and rote reproduction of content are generally associated with lower levels of academic risk-taking[12]
Academic outcomes
Academic risk-taking involves engaging with complex and challenging learning material. Based on the concept of desirable difficulties, challenging learning tasks promote long-term learning success.[13][14] Recognizing and correcting errors supports deeper knowledge integration, self-regulation, and improves learning outcomes[15]. Empirical findings have shown positive associations between academic risk-taking and academic achievement among both secondary school students[16] and university students[17] The International Baccalaureate Organization recognizes risk taking as a key learner profile attribute[18], and other professional educators similarly have identified academic risk-taking as a positive learner characteristic that is developed through supportive instructional practices[19],[20].


LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.
These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
See the advice page on large language models for more information.