Draft:BE Lyncis

Delta Scuti variable star in the constellation Lynx From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

BE Lyncis is a white-hued variable star in the northern constellation of Lynx. It has the identifier HD 79889 in the Henry Draper Catalogue; BE Lyn is the variable-star designation. With an apparent magnitude of 8.80, it is too faint to be seen by the naked eye but can be observed via binoculars. It is located at a distance of 821 light-years (252 pc) according to Gaia EDR3 parallax measurements, and is moving away from the Sun at a heliocentric radial velocity of 3.906 km/s.

Right ascension09h 18m 17.18s[1]
Declination+46° 09 11.3[1]
Quick facts Observation data Epoch J2000.0 Equinox J2000.0, Constellation ...
BE Lyncis

Observation data
Epoch J2000.0      Equinox J2000.0
Constellation Lynx
Right ascension 09h 18m 17.18s[1]
Declination +46° 09 11.3[1]
Apparent magnitude (V) 8.8±0.009[2]
Characteristics
Spectral type A3[3]:36
Variable type δ Sct
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)3.9064 km/s
Proper motion (μ) RA: 7.95 mas/yr
Dec.: 0.753 mas/yr
Parallax (π)3.8638±0.0519 mas[1]
Distance840 ± 10 ly
(259 ± 3 pc)
Other designations
BE Lyn, BD+46 1490, HD 79889, HIP 45649, SAO 42793, TIC 56914404, TYC 3425-1038-1, 2MASS J09181718+4609112[4]
Database references
SIMBADdata
Close

Observational history

The star was included in the Henry Draper Catalogue in 1919 as the 79,889th entry (designation HD 79889) and assigned the spectral type of A3.[3]:36 HD 79889's variability was first noted during regular UBV observations at the Kvistaberg Observatory in April 1985 and confirmed in October of that year. In 1987, the star was determined to be a very likely high-amplitude dwarf Cepheid with a period of 0.0958697 days (2.30 h), though the possibility it was an older SX Phoenicis variable could not be ruled out.[5] It received the variable-star designation BE Lyn in 1989, classified as a Delta Scuti variable varying from magnitude 8.60 to 9.00.[6]

A gradual decrease in the star's pulsation period was reported in 1991 from the analysis of V-band observations conducted at Xinglong Station between 1988 and 1989.[7] However, follow-up observations carried out at the same observatory in 1992 and between 1993 and 1994 instead revealed a parabolic period increase.[8][9] Around this time, several period measurements yielded slightly discrepant results.[a]

Proposed companions

Footnotes

  1. Rodríguez et al. (1990) gave a value of 0.095869448(21) days,[10] whereas Wunder et al. (1992) placed the period at 0.095869483(14) days.[11]

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI