Draft:Democracy Barometer
one of the [[democracy rankings]]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Democracy Barometer is an index aiming to measure the quality of democracy across countries using indicators grouped under the "principles" of freedom, control and equality, each with three "functions". Methodologically, it aims to use many indicators rather than a single expert score. Its codebook says the project collected about 300 possible indicators and selected about 98 for the index, aiming for a transparent, theory-driven measurement strategy.
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,381 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Wiki-vr.mp (talk | contribs) 39 days ago. (Update)
This draft has been submitted and is currently awaiting review. |
|
|
freedom
|
control
|
equality
|
|
|
The latest version (7, dated 2020) was developed by the Centre for Democracy Aarau (ZDA) and the Department of Political Science (IPZ) at the University of Zurich (UZH) for comparative political research and provides downloadable data, codebooks, and documentation.[1] As of April 2026[update], this latest version of the Democracy Barometer dataset covers 53 countries and territories from 1990 to 2017. The countries and territories covered are:[2]
- Albania
- Australia
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Chile
- Costa Rica
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Czechoslovakia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- FR Yugoslavia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Japan
- Kosovo
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Panama
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Turkey
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Uruguay
The Democracy Barometer was developed by Daniel Bochsler, back then a researcher at the University of Zurich and the Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (ZDA), in collaboration with Wolfgang Merkel of the Berlin Social Science Center (WZB)[3] a joint project between the WZB and ZDA (2009–13, 20013–17),[3] as a split-off from the project Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR).[4] Since 2018, the Centre for Democracy Aarau (ZDA) and the Department of Political Science (IPZ) at the University of Zurich (UZH) are responsible for the Democracy Barometer.
Critique
The Democracy Barometer attempts to make the quality differences of democracy between established democracies more measurable. However, its methodology, validity and accuracy are often strongly questioned. A.o. as Switzerland, a country known for its developed direct democracy, performs worse than, for example, the USA.[5][6] This is attributed to insufficiently developed methodologies and assessment criteria.[7][8][9]
The basic idea behind the “Democracy Barometer” is highly questionable. The assumption that the quality of democratic systems of government can be determined using a clear definition of democracy and that countries can be compared through a one-dimensional ranking corresponds neither to the tradition of democratic theory nor to the current state of academic discussion on measuring the quality of democracy.
— Joachim Blatter, University of Lucerne[7]
