Draft:Readpeak
Finnish ad-tech company
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Readpeak is a Finnish digital advertising technology company headquartered in Helsinki[1], specializing in programmatic native advertising. It operates a self-service demand-side platform (DSP) that enables advertisers and agencies to create, optimize, and manage native advertising campaigns across a network of publisher sites.[2]
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,915 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 3 February 2026 by Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk). This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.
Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: Reference 2 is unreliable because LinkedIn is user-generated and References 3 and 8 look to be on ExchangeWire's blog so they are unreliable. See WP:RS for more information on reliable sources.You are advertising the services and features of the company, especially in with editorial coverage highlighting both product evolution and strategic leadership appointments
. We are trying to effectively summarize what reliable secondary sources say about the company in a neutral point of view that odes not promote the subject. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
- Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.