Draft:Sanjay Dhar

Judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Justice Sanjay Dhar is an Indian judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, having assumed office on 7 April 2020.[1][2]

  • Comment: This needs citations against the draft's text, rather than a dump of sources at the end. See WP:REFB See WP:BLP. Without that it's difficult to be sure of what is sourcing which piece of text, and thus notability is unclear.
    The subject is likely notable under WP:NPOL, in overall terms. ChrysGalley (talk) 12:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Aryan2026 (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)


Quick facts Hon'ble JusticeSanjay Dhar, Judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh ...
Hon'ble Justice
Sanjay Dhar
Judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
Assumed office
7 April 2020
Nominated bySharad Arvind Bobde
Appointed byRam Nath Kovind
Personal details
Born
EducationBachelor of Science
Bachelor of Law
Alma materUniversity of Kashmir
Websitehttps://jkhighcourt.nic.in/cjjk.php
Close

Early Life and Career

Sanjay Dhar obtained a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Kashmir[3]. He enrolled as an advocate in 1990 and subsequently practiced at the Delhi High Court[4]. In 1997, he joined the judicial service as a Munsiff[5]. Over the following decades, he held various judicial and administrative postings within the lower courts of Jammu and Kashmir[6]. Immediately prior to his elevation as a High Court judge in April 2020, he served as the Registrar General of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court[7][8]

Appointment to the High Court

Justice Dhar was appointed as a judge of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh through a notification issued by the Government of India on 3 April 2020. He took oath of office on 7 April 2020.[9]

Notable judgments

During his tenure at the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, Justice Sanjay Dhar has authored rulings involving media ethics, service law, and civil procedure:

  • Media defamation and journalists: Justice Dhar quashed a defamation complaint against journalists Arnab Goswami and Aditya Raj Kaul, ruling that a journalist cannot be prosecuted for defamation solely for reporting on a subject in the public interest based on official sources.[10]
  • Defamation via "terrorist" allegations: He ruled that labelling an individual as a "terrorist associate" or "overground worker" in a newspaper report is per se defamatory. The court held that such allegations damage a person's reputation and cannot be published without credible, supporting evidence.[11]
  • Service law in private institutions: Justice Dhar ruled that the selection and service conditions of employees in private, unaided schools are fundamentally contractual. Consequently, disputes regarding these conditions are generally not enforceable through writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.[12]
  • Domestic Violence Act proceedings: In a ruling regarding the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, he observed that proceedings under the Act are primarily civil in nature. The court held that if a respondent fails to appear after being summoned, a magistrate should ordinarily proceed ex parte rather than immediately issuing arrest warrants.[13]
  • Military service and civil appointments: In a case involving an Indian Air Force (IAF) airman who qualified for the Jammu and Kashmir Administrative Service (JKAS) despite lacking formal prior permission, Justice Dhar ruled that the airman could be discharged to pursue his civil career. The court granted equitable relief and directed the candidate to pay a ₹3 lakh penalty to the IAF for the technical breach of service rules.[14]
  • Protection of sports personalities: Justice Dhar quashed a corruption FIR filed against Bilquis Mir, India's first female Olympic jury member for water sports. The court ruled that the investigation was a "witch-hunt" and criticized the investigating agencies for harassing a sporting figure without sufficient cause.[15]

See also

References

Further Reading

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI