Draft talk:Dramageddon

I have created Draft:Dramageddon, about an informal media term used in coverage of several YouTube beauty-community controversies from 2018 to 2020. I am looking for feedback before submitting it through Articles for Creation.

I would especially appreciate comments on:

• whether the draft is appropriately scoped as a broader internet-culture/media phenomenon rather than a single-feud article;
• whether the sourcing demonstrates notability for the broader topic;
• whether the “Major controversies” and “Key figures” sections are neutral and BLP-safe;
• whether any sections should be trimmed, merged, or expanded.

The draft uses secondary coverage from sources including Business Insider, Vox, Time, The Verge, The Atlantic, Wired, The New Yorker, and academic sources on YouTube drama/cancel culture. Any feedback is welcome. 21mis (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Since the comment above, Draft:Dramageddon has been submitted through Articles for Creation. I am no longer asking for pre-submission feedback, but I would still appreciate comments on scope, sourcing, and policy concerns while the draft is waiting for AfC review.

I would especially appreciate feedback on:

• whether the draft is appropriately scoped as a broader internet-culture/media phenomenon rather than a single-feud article;
• whether the sourcing demonstrates notability for the broader topic;
• whether the “Major controversies” and “People discussed in coverage” sections are neutral and BLP-safe;
• whether any sections should be trimmed, merged, or expanded;
• whether the topic would be better handled as a standalone article, redirect, or merge.

Feedback has also been requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Media and the Articles for Creation help desk.

Any feedback is welcome. 21mis (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2026 (UTC)