Draft talk:Legora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC outcome and next steps

Based on the most AfC feedback, I understand that the current coverage of Legora does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. I won't pursue further resubmissions unless substantially more in-depth, independent, secondary coverage emerges that would change this assessment.

Thanks to editors who took the time to assess the draft and provide feedback.

Neilyoung77 (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2026 (UTC)


Most notable cited articles

Listing notable articles here to assist reviewers when assessing notability. Thanks Neilyoung77 (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Improved draft after deletion

This draft is a completely human rewritten and fully sourced article about Legora, following previous deletion. All statements/claims have been checked for accuracy and cite independent, reputable sources (eg Business Insider, Reuters, Forbes). Legora is now a tech unicorn and widely recognised in media coverage as a leading company in the legal AI sector, with a valuation of $1.8 billion and hundreds of global law firm clients. Please let me know of any concerns. Neilyoung77 (talk) 12:20, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Resubmission: sourcing and tone

Resubmitting after clarifying sources. Also addressed tone issues to ensure strict neutrality. The draft cites multiple in-depth, independent, reliable secondary sources including Reuters, Bloomberg Law, Business Insider, Forbes and Sifted (backed by the Financial Times). These provide substantial coverage of Legora beyond routine announcements. Neilyoung77 (talk) 10:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Feedback

Keen to get feedback on this draft before resubmitting! I've addressed previous reviewer feedback by improving sourcing, making sections more concise, and removing any language that could be deemed promotional. Before resubmitting I'd be hugely grateful if any experienced editors could review the draft and suggest any further changes or additions that could be made. Thanks so much. Neilyoung77 Neilyoung77 (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Resubmission note

I have removed the BusinessWire citation - the site largely seems to share press releases - and replaced with independent sources. As noted above, I have also edited language and sections to ensure neutrality. Thanks to reviewers for taking the time to look at this. Neilyoung77 (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Resubmission note

Worked on the draft to address notability concerns. Changes include:

  • Cited two Financial Times articles which give substantive coverage of Legora
  • Edits to remove language which could be construed as promotional. Thanks @WestwoodHights573 for your help here.
  • Added an external link to a CEO interview for added context
  • Have also removed reference to Reddit AMA as only citation was self-published.

Thanks as always to reviewers. Neilyoung77 (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Resubmission note

Resubmitting after significant edit to address concerns regarding AI generation.

Specific changes made in this version include:

  • Restructuring the History section: The previous draft used a repetitive chronological listing style. I've rewritten this into natural prose to break this pattern.
  • Neutralising tone: Renamed the "Features" section to "Platform"
  • Edits for accuracy: I have removed some unnecessary details and tightened language throughout the draft

Thanks for your time in reviewing this. Neilyoung77 (talk) 10:49, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI