Draft talk:Musk v. Altman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
 | This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence | |
|
 | This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw | |
|
|
- @Bobby Cohn: That discussion was in March. There has been significant coverage in the last ten months which easily demonstrates that the case meets notability guidelines. Thriley (talk) 17:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Thriley, of course, hence my addition of the {{draft article}} template which includes the necessary button Submit for review. If you do believe it has met the threshold for notability, then I would invite you to submit it. I leave my comment as a reference to reviewers to quickly identify what the sole issue is at WP:AFC, making it an easier review to conduct if there is only one issue to consider. This is easier than to spot than {{old AfD multi}} on the talk page, and explains the current situation of the redirect at the article title now present in mainspace. Kindly, Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Comment: If submitted for review, reviewers ought to consider the notability concerns raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musk v. OpenAI which determined that this subject was not yet notable, and redirected the title. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)