End of the 19th Dynasty

During his lifetime, Ramesses the Great led several famous military battles and campaigns, including conflicts with the Libyans and Hittites, notably the Battle of Kadesh. He also oversaw diplomatic efforts such as the Egyptian–Hittite peace treaty and the relocation of the Egyptian capital to Pi-Ramesses.^[2] Ramesses the Great achieved great things and is often regarded as Egypt's greatest Pharaoh. He had a long life with numerous heirs who were given prominent positions in the government as generals, governors, scribes and more. Ramesses II fathered around 100 children and reigned as the third ruler of the Nineteenth Dynasty. He even outlived his first heir, also named Ramesses, and decentralised power among many members of the royal family.^[2]

Aidan Dodson argues that Ramesses the Great bears responsibility for the power struggles. He extended the concept of the "royal family" beyond previous rulers by not only granting titles to his descendants, but also publicly presenting them as royalty. In addition, he had several first or great wives, causing confusion in the order of succession as to which eldest son would inherit the throne. It is in this context that the upheavals of the second half of the 19th Dynasty and beyond should be understood.^[3]

Ramesses the Great was eventually succeeded by his son Merneptah, who was probably elderly by this time. During his reign, Merneptah led military campaigns against Egypt's enemies. In the fifth year of his reign, he faced the Libyans and their king Mereye. He also encountered the mysterious Sea Peoples, marking the beginning of the collapse of the Bronze Age. However, according to Ian Shaw, the rest of Merneptah's reign seems to have been relatively peaceful. He died in the 9th (according to Ian Shaw), 11th (according to Dodson) or 12th (according to Vivienne Gae Callender) year of his reign, after having settled the borders of Egypt. His death triggered a war of succession, as he had designated his son Seti II as his successor.^[4][5][6][3]

Ramesses II expanded the Egyptian military by adding a new division ("Mesha") called "Set" in the new capital. This made a total of four divisions: "Amun" in Thebes, "Re" in Heliopolis, "Ptah" in Memphis, and the new "Set" division in the capital. Each division had about 5,000 soldiers and was further divided into 20 companies ("sa") or chariot squadrons. Each company had 250 soldiers or 50 chariots in a squadron, which were further divided into 5 platoons. This organisation made the New Kingdom armies more professional and organised than the Middle Kingdom armies, which relied more on conscripts. The military structure of the New Kingdom was similar to modern armies, and these four divisions later took part in the Battle of Kadesh.^[7]

1. Map of New Kingdom Egypt around 1200 bc
2. Ramesses the Great, showcasing an Egyptian chariot of the period
3. "Nomes" or administrative divisions of New Kingdom Egypt, Ramesses the Great named his children to these posts among other posts. Amenmesse as an example is said to have been "Heqa-waset" or Nomarch of Thebes, number four on the map.
4. Upper line of pictures; Tausret, Setnakhte and Ramesses III
5. Amenmesse
6. Seti II

The following people are known to have at least claimed the title of Pharaoh during this period:

• Amenmesse
• Seti II
• Tausret
• Siptah
• Setnakht

Late Bronze Age collapse

• Fall of the Hittite Empire – Ruled by Šuppiluliuma II
• Destruction of Ugarit – A Trading city, vassal of the Hittites
• Trojan War – Possibly depending on dating and veracity of the events
• Inter-dynastic conflict in Assyria – Tukulti-Ninurta I was assassinated triggering civil strife
• Warfare in Mycenaean Greece – There are evidence of warfare and destruction

Scholars primarily use the regnal years of various pharaohs to establish chronology, as scholars disagree about the alignment of these events with our modern system of counting years. The 5th year of a particular pharaoh may correspond to different years in BC, depending on the source. However, there is a relatively high degree of agreement between sources when it comes to placing events in specific years of a monarch's reign. Although there may still be occasional discrepancies in this regard, they are generally less variable than the translations into our contemporary year system.

Determining the descent of pharaohs can be uncertain. This uncertainty extends to other pharaohs mentioned in the list of claimants, except for Seti II, who is known to be descended from Merneptah. The relationship of Tausret, Amenmesse and Setnakhte to the ruling dynasty remains unclear, although it is accepted that they are related. There is often debate about their familial relationships, including questions of parentage, siblingship, etc. These complexities should be taken into account when studying these historical events.^{[4][5][8][6][3]}

Upon Merneptah's death, both Seti II, Merneptah's eldest son, and Amenmesse claimed the throne. Amenmesse, of unknown parentage but royal lineage, was able to overthrow Seti but not completely remove him from power in Upper Egypt. This lasted until the end of the second year of Seti's reign, around 1201 BC. By the fifth year of Seti's reign, around 1198 BC, Seti seemed to have regained control of all Egypt and he died in the sixth year of his reign, around 1197 BC. Thereafter, there is no historical record of Amenmesse beyond Seti's fifth year, suggesting his probable death, as Seti later portrayed him as "the enemy" in his propaganda and murals.^{[4][5][8][6][3]}

Dodson suggests that Messuy may have been Amenmesse. Messuy was the Viceroy of Kush, but during Merneptah's reign the position shifted to Khaemtjitry, who then defected and became Amenmesse's viceroy. This move was significant as it aligned Amenmesse with the military strength of Kush. There has been speculation about a possible high-level purge during the transition to Seti II's rule, which may have been the catalyst for the coming conflict. Seti II's overthrow seems to have been effective in the Thebaid region, as some workers in Deir el-Medina were killed in the transfer of power, according to surviving documents. Seti's name disappears from the records of Deir el-Medina in the last month of his second year of reign.^[3]

Amenmesse's control of Egypt began about five months after Merneptah's death, starting near the second cataract but not yet reaching Abu Simbel. Initially, Amenmesse's progress was slow, with Seti II still in charge of Amada early in the second year of his reign. Thebes fell within 18 months of the start of the rebellion. Amenmesse eventually advanced to Fayyum, leaving Seti with a reduced state in the Delta. The progress is evidenced by the monuments and stelae erected in these regions, which gradually ceased under Seti, indicating his waning authority. Chancellor Bay may have played a role in Seti's restoration, although the details remain unclear.^[3] Seti II is thought to have been based at Per-Rameses, near Avaris, during his years fighting Amenmesse and after the loss of Fayyum.^[9]

Seti effectively ruled as Pharaoh for about three years after the death of Merneptah, from about 1203 to 1200 BC. He then faced a period of about two years, from the years 1199 to 1198 BC, during which he was deposed or pushed out of the centre of power. He regained power eventually and ruled peacefully for one last year in 1197 BC. Whether Seti's death was natural or the result of foul play remains unknown.^[4][5][8][6]

Following Seti's death, his widow Tausret assumed leadership, first through Siptah and later in her own right. Initially, Seti was married to Takhat. In the second year of his reign, around 1202 BC, he married his relative Tausret, possibly to strengthen his position through this alliance. It is believed that both Seti and Tausret were in their early twenties at this time. The period of struggle, strife, war or civil war, as described by various authors, lasted about five years. Seti's power base was originally in the north, while Amenmesse held sway in the south of Thebes, and possibly extending into Nubia.^[4][5][8][6]

Siptah, who succeeded Seti II, was a child and too young to rule alone. Ian Shaw's book suggests that Siptah was the son of Seti II, while Toby Wilkinson's book suggests that he may have been the son of Amenmesse. Wilkinson also speculates that Siptah may have been an attempt to unite those still loyal to the late Amenmesse.^[5]

On the other hand, Callender states that Siptah's father remains unknown, but the change of his name from Rameses-Siptah to Merneptah-Siptah suggests a direct link to Merneptah. Meanwhile, Dodson suggests that Siptah was the son of Amenmesse, who in turn was the son of Seti II through a lesser known figure called Takhat.^[8][3]

However, all these historians agree on one point: Siptah's accession was probably due to a lack of more legitimate heirs. This period of uncertainty may have lasted from year 1 (c. 1203 BC) to year 5 (c. 1198 BC) of Seti's reign. An interregnum followed and marked the beginning of the end of the 19th Dynasty.^{[4][5][8][6][3]}