Eschatogonia dissecta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Eschatogonia dissecta | |
|---|---|
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Fungi |
| Division: | Ascomycota |
| Class: | Lecanoromycetes |
| Order: | Lecanorales |
| Family: | Ramalinaceae |
| Genus: | Eschatogonia |
| Species: | E. dissecta |
| Binomial name | |
| Eschatogonia dissecta Timdal & R.Sant. (2008) | |
![]() Holotype: Jenaro Herrera, Peru | |
Eschatogonia dissecta is a species of corticolous (bark-dwelling) squamulose lichen in the family Ramalinaceae.[1] The species was formally described in 2008 by the lichenologists Einar Timdal and Rolf Santesson, based on material collected from lowland Amazonian rainforest in northern Peru. It is distinguished from related species by its very finely dissected, scale-like structures with thread-thin lobes only 0.08–0.2 mm wide and by its distinctive needle-like ascospores that are 26–40 micrometres long. The lichen is known from primary rainforests in Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, and French Guiana, where it grows on the shaded bark of tree trunks in consistently humid, undisturbed forest environments.
Eschatogonia dissecta is a squamulose lichen in the Ramalinaceae that was formally described in 2008 by the lichenologists Einar Timdal and Rolf Santesson, based on material collected in lowland Amazonian rainforest in northern Peru. Timdal and Santesson distinguished the species from the widespread E. prolifera and from E. angustiloba by its markedly finer, more deeply dissected squamules and by its much longer, needle-like (acicular) ascospores (26–40 μm). Chemically, the thallus contains homosekikaic acid, hyperhomosekikaic acid, or a mixture of the two, but it lacks zeorin and the didymic acid aggregate that typify other members of the genus. Field observations show E. dissecta growing intermixed with E. prolifera, corroborating the stability of its diagnostic characters even when both taxa share the same tree trunks.[2]
Although three chemotypes are recognised, they show no consistent morphological or anatomical differences, so all collections are treated within a single, chemically variable species. The combination of small, deeply lobed squamules, acicular spores, and the homosekikaic acid profile provides a reliable set of characters for identification.[2]
