Gothic war against Aegidius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Gothic war against Aegidius | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of Roman civil war of 461 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| Belligerents | ||||||||
| Goths |
Romans Franks Alans | Western Roman Empire | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | ||||||||
|
Theoderic II Frederic |
Aegidius Childeric |
Ricimer Agrippinus Gundioc | ||||||
| Strength | ||||||||
| 10,000–15,000 | 10,000 | unknown | ||||||
The Gothic War against Aegidius is a relatively obscure episode from late Antiquity. The war took place in Gaul (present-day France) during the chaotic years before the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Information about this war is scarce and fragmented. Priscus is seen as the main source of the military campaigns against Aegidius. His writings have been largely lost, but fragmentarily handed down by later authors such as Jordanes, Gregory of Tours and Marius of Avenches. Furthermore, Hydatius gives a chronological statement of the events and the letters of Sidonius Apollinaris give insight into the relations between the Roman elite and the Germanic rulers. This makes it possible to reconstruct the course of the war, albeit summarily.
Parties involved
The conflict took place during the civil war that broke out shortly after the assassination of Emperor Majorian, and can be seen as a direct consequence of it. The main stakeholders were Aegidius, a Roman general and magister militum per Gallia who actually exerted a semi-independent power in northern Gaul and rex Theodoric II, king of the Goths in Aquitaine, who remained loyal to central Roman authority in Italy. In the background was Ricimer, the powerful Roman general who was responsible for the fall of Majorian and the appointment of Libius Severus as emperor.
Aegidius, a supporter of Majorian, resisted the seizure of power. Theodoric II played a key role in this power game of the Romans. His support for Ricimer, in his capacity as foederati of the Western Roman emperor, was of essential importance. Further more historians suggest, because direct evidence is lacking, that the Burgundian rex Gundioc, who was a brother-in-law of Ricimer and like Theodoric II a foederatus, may also be involved in the war against Aegidius, possibly even in a military way.
Situation in Gaul
After the assassination of Emperor Majorian, Roman authority in Italy lost almost all control of Gaul. The Gallic army was under the command of Aegidius, while Ricimer only had the Italian army. He could not deploy this army without risk: the defense of the Italian coast against raids of the Vandals was a priority, and a military confrontation with Aegidius would weaken his own position. [1] In an attempt to get the Gallic army under control, Ricimer on his own initiative had the new emperor in Libius Severus appoint a certain Agrippinus as the new militum per Gallias, as a counterweight to Aegidius.
Other players to be taken into account were the Gothic and Burgundian foederati: the Goths in Aquitania under the direction of Theodoric II and the Burgundians by Gundioc. Through the diplomacy of Agrippinus, Ricimer managed to win Theodoric as an ally. Thedoric's support was mainly motivated by his own interest. After all, a few years earlier, he himself had unleashed a uprising with the aim of gaining more power and territorial expansion.
Size of the armies
Aegidius' army consisted largely troops of the imperial army that had been stationed in the area of Paris. According to Priscus, he had a large army estimated by modern historians at about 6,000 to 10,000 soldiers.[2] In addition to regular units—the comitatenses and limitanei—his force also included units of Alans and Sarmatians, whose settlements were near Orleans.[3] Gregory of Tours suggests in his Historia Francorum that Childeric I operate together with Aegidius.[4]
The Gothic army of Theodoric II was probably smaller than that of his father Theodoric I (418–451), who once brought 20,000 men to his feet in collaboration with Aetius. Yet Theodoric II still had 10,000 to 15,000 fighters. This was not a fixed army, but consisted of an armed force of free men who brought their own weapons. The core consisted of infantry, supplemented by a significant cavalry unit formed by the elite. Many of their tactics were taken from those of the Romans.