Guru Gembul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Born1985 (age 4041)
Occupations
Knownfor
Guru Gembul
Born1985 (age 4041)
Alma materIndonesia University of Education
Occupations
Known for
YouTube information
Channel
Years active2019–present
Subscribers1.68 million
Views340 million
Last updated: October 20, 2025

Guru Gembul (lit.'Chubby Teacher', c. 15 February 1985) is an Indonesian activist, historian, teacher, and content creator, known for his far-liberal social media content.

In Javanese, the word gembul is an adjective meaning "overeating", while guru is "teacher" or "coach". According to a number of local publications, he is known to be originally named Jafar Rohadi,[1] but this was immediately denied by him.[2] The word gembul also represents a portmanteau of gemar ngibul, a phrase translated as "enjoying vague discussions" from Indonesian.[citation needed]

The expression Baraya is frequently recited by him. It is a Sundanese word meaning "sibling", but is used by Guru Gembul at a wide connotation, and so approximating "fellow" in meaning and usage.[3]

Life

Guru Gembul's personal life is very secretive and his real identity is still a mystery, Guru Gembul is thought to be named "Johan Riyadi", "Jafar Rohadi", or "Jafar Riyadi", but this was later denied by him directly. He is known to be a graduate of Indonesia University of Education.[4] Guru Gembul stated that he is a teacher at a school in Bandung, while his monthly income from his YouTube channel is estimated to reach $1,7K to $27,2K or around IDR 26,134,100 to IDR 372,026,600. Thus, his income in a year is around $20,4K to $326,1K or around IDR to IDR 5,013,135,300.[5] Autobiographically, Guru Gembul has an experience teaching social science at a high school in Bandung.[1]

Activity

Gembul started his career on YouTube and made videos discussing science, technology, social philosophy, and conspiracy theories. His thoughts on moderate Islam and his criticism of religious communities in Indonesia made his content quite popular in Indonesia.[6] Guru Gembul emphasized that he was neither a Sunni nor a Shia, and that he did not follow any Islamic sect.[7] As a result of his criticism of the "kaum Habaib" which is translated as people who respect the habibs, Guru Gembul was accused of being an extremist.[8]

His conflict with Bahar bin Smith, one of Indonesia's habib and ulama, began when Guru Gembul noticed that Bahar could not read the kitab kuning, a set of Arabic-language educational texts in the Islamic curriculum commonly used in boarding schools in Indonesia, correctly.[9][10] Guru Gembul regretted this, and called Bahar bin Smith a "fake cleric", and doubted Bahar's lineage as a respected habib.[11] Guru Gembul then highlighted the use of false hadith in Bahar's statement which asserted that he was truly a descendant of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.[12][13] Rhoma Irama and Zein Assegaf, other public figures who were also in conflict with Bahar at that time, agreed with Guru Gembul's statement, regretting that this had happened to a cleric.[14] Furthermore, Rhoma and Guru Gembul challenged Bahar to prove the authenticity of his lineage through a DNA test, this offended Bahar, stating that he could agree to it, but with a number of conditions.[15]

In a seminar in Bandung, Guru Gembul criticized the education system in Indonesia, and pushed for changes to the education system.[16] He also criticized the low salaries given to teachers in Indonesia, which he said was what triggered the decline in the quality of Indonesian education.[17]

Controversy

In 2023, as a result of his criticism of teachers and education in Indonesia, five education activists sent an open letter containing a summons to Guru Gembul for his statement in a national education talk show broadcast on BTV on June 1, 2023. Activists considered Guru Gembul's statement about teacher competence to be an insult to the teaching profession. In his clarification, Guru Gembul said that he only criticized the Education and Teacher Training Institution (LPTK) that prepares teachers, further stating that his statement had been misunderstood and should not have resulted in a summons.[18] The issue was later resolved amicably, with all parties agreeing that "only some teachers were incompetent".[19]

Content

Bibliography

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI