Hamilton v Papakura District Council
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name Hamilton & Anor v. Papakura District Council & Watercare Services Limited
Decided28 February 2002
Citation[2000] 1 NZLR 265, [2002] 3 NZLR 308, [2002] UKPC 9
| Hamilton v Papakura District Council (New Zealand) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Judicial Committee of the Privy Council |
| Full case name | Hamilton & Anor v. Papakura District Council & Watercare Services Limited |
| Decided | 28 February 2002 |
| Citation | [2000] 1 NZLR 265, [2002] 3 NZLR 308, [2002] UKPC 9 |
| Transcript | Privy Council judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hutton, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Sir Andrew Leggatt, Sir Kenneth Keith |
| Keywords | |
| negligence | |
Hamilton v Papakura District Council (New Zealand) [2002] UKPC 9 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding liability under tort for negligence under Rylands v Fletcher.[1]