Hay v Chalmers

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Hay was the former accountant of Chalmers, and Chalmers, a self-employed mechanic made defamatory remarks to numerous suppliers and creditors of that he had not only misappropriated money from him, but that he was also currently under investigation for this misconduct. All of which was later proven to be false. As a result of these statements, the plaintiff lost clients and suffered a financial loss.

Rather than Hay sue Chalmers for defamation, he instead chose to file an action for damages under the Fair Trading Act where there are few defences, where all the plaintiff had to prove that these statements were misleading, and that they were made in the course of trade.

The court held that the statements were both misleading, as well as being made in the course of trade, and was awarded $80,000 in damages under the Fair Trading Act.^{[citation needed]}