Haze machine
Homogenous cloud producer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Haze machines, or haze generators (commonly referred to as hazers), are effects machines similar to fog machines, designed to produce unobtrusive, homogeneous clouds suspended in the air intended primarily to make light beams visible or create a subtle diffusion.
Properties
Unlike theatrical fog, which is typically intended to be dense and/or opaque, haze is generally very light and subtle. These properties allow a venue to be filled with haze prior to or during an event without creating an overtly distracting cloud. Haze typically has a substantially longer persistence ("hang time") than conventional theatrical fog. While conventional fog will hang in the air for several minutes, a haze effect filling the same volume of space can last upwards of an hour to several hours or more, depending on the size of the venue and the amount of ventilation.
The fluid used in haze machines to generate the effects is either oil or water-based. Most oil-based haze fluids use a mineral oil base, while water-based fluids use either a propylene glycol or glycerol base. Although both formulations of fluid are referred to as haze fluid, the different formulations are neither compatible nor interchangeable. Propylene glycol/water haze fluid is sometimes referred to as "water based haze" to avoid ambiguity. Describing the fluid as "glycol" might cause stagehands to use automotive antifreeze, which contains ethylene glycol,[1] and unlike propylene glycol, must not be used for this purpose because of its toxicity.
Technology
Crackers
Crackers (also known as "oil crackers") were first developed in the 1960s. The fluid is usually, though not always, refined mineral oil. Crackers work by use of a spray pump powered either by electricity or compressed CO2 passing through a dispersion head into a fluid reservoir. The compressed air aerosols the fluid, dispersing fine droplets. Because the haze is mechanically generated, this type of machine does not require any warm-up time.
Pump spray
Pump spray haze machines use electricity or compressed CO2 to power a spray pump connected to a mixing valve, which draws in and atomizes the fluid.
Pump hazers also include machines which function in the same manner as a fog machine, pumping fluid into a heated chamber where it is vapourized to produce a cloud. Hazers, which heat fluid to create an atmospheric effect, only use mixtures of water and glycol or glycerine. Spray hazers, which atomize fluid, can use either a water-based or mineral oil fluid.
Aerosol
Smaller volumes of haze can also be generated from aerosol canisters containing mineral oil under pressure. Although the density of haze generated and the volume of space that can be filled are significantly smaller than those of a haze machine, aerosol canisters have the advantages of portability, no requirements for electricity, and finer control over the volume of haze generated.
Ultrasonic
Ultrasonic haze machines use transducers submerged in a reservoir of fluid to create atmospheric effects. Although less common than some of the other technologies used to produce haze, ultrasonic hazers are promoted as generating their effects with much less noise than other technologies.
Faze machines
Faze machines, or fazers, can also be used to produce a haze-like effect. These machines are typically fog machines with a fan built in front to disperse the output, creating a haze-like effect. These machines are typically considered more cost effective, with prices ranging from US$100–400 as compared to haze machines with prices ranging from US$400–1,400.
Fire detection
Although the atmospheric effect created by hazers produces a significantly smaller particle size, around one micrometre (um), compared to the effect generated by a fog machine (hence the finer composition of the "cloud"), the size of the particle and effect varies by manufacturer and type of fluid used. Because of this, haze is far less likely to set off fire alarms than fog machines or larger smoke particles.
Adverse health effects
Fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅)
Haze machines operate by vaporizing glycol‑ or mineral‑oil‑based fluids to create a long‑lasting atmospheric haze. Although the droplets produced by haze machines fall within the size range of fine particulate matter, known as PM₂.₅, most evaluations of haze emissions have not reported PM₂.₅ concentrations in the micrograms‑per‑cubic‑meter (µg/m³) units used in ambient air‑quality regulation. PM₂.₅ is associated with respiratory, cardiovascular, and other systemic health effects.[2][3]
Industry and occupational‑health documents typically report haze concentrations in milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m³). Guidance levels cited in reports from Rosco Laboratories, the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, and the American Society of Entertainment Personnel and Organizations recommend peak concentrations of 10–40 mg/m³ for glycol‑based atmospheric effects and up to 25 mg/m³ for mineral‑oil haze.[4][5][6] Because 1 mg/m³ equals 1,000 µg/m³, these values correspond to 10,000–40,000 µg/m³.
For comparison, the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s 24‑hour PM₂.₅ standard is 35 µg/m³,[7] and the World Health Organization’s 24‑hour PM₂.₅ guideline is 15 µg/m³.[8] These regulatory values are expressed in µg/m³, so comparing them with mg/m³ aerosol measurements requires converting units.
Published evaluations of theatrical atmospheric effects have reported aerosol concentrations in milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m³), but have not measured size‑fractionated particulate matter such as PM₂.₅. A Health Hazard Evaluation by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health measured glycol aerosol exposure in theatrical settings but did not include PM₂.₅ measurements.[9] A study conducted by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and ENVIRON for Actors’ Equity Association and the League of American Theaters and Producers evaluated theatrical smoke, haze, and pyrotechnics and reported aerosol concentrations in mg/m³, but likewise did not provide PM₂.₅ or other size‑specific particulate measurements.[10]
Because haze machine droplets fall within the size range that contributes to PM₂.₅, and because existing studies report only bulk aerosol mass rather than size‑fractionated particulate concentrations, fine‑particle exposure from haze machine use in enclosed spaces remains insufficiently characterized.