Imperial Munitions Board
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Imperial Munitions Board (IMB) was the Canadian branch of the British Ministry of Munitions, set up in Canada under the chairmanship of Joseph Wesley Flavelle. It was formed by the British War Cabinet to alleviate the Shell Crisis of 1915 during the First World War. The Board was mandated to arrange for the manufacture of war materials in Canada on behalf of the British government.
It was the general and exclusive purchasing agent on behalf of the War Office, the Admiralty, the British Timber Controller, the Department of Aeronautics and the Ministry of Munitions, and also acted as an agent for the United States Ordnance Department.[1]
Scope
In a 1917 address, Carnegie reported that the Board was then dealing with 650 factories in 144 towns, stretching from Halifax to Victoria.[22] By 1918, the extent of its acquisition of lumber required the operation of 67 logging camps in British Columbia.[23] The British Government was responsible for all its expenditure.[24]
The British War Cabinet also noted the extent of Canada's war production in 1918:
15 per cent of the total expenditure of the Ministry of Munitions in the last six months of the year was incurred in that country. She has manufactured nearly every type of shell from the 18-pounder to the 9.2-inch. In the case of the 18-pdr., no less than 55 per cent of the output of shrapnel shells in the last six months came from Canada, and most of these were complete rounds of ammunition, which went direct to France. Canada also contributed 42 per cent of the total 4.5 shells, 27 per cent of the 6-inch shells, 20 per cent of the 60-pdr. H.E. shells, 15 per cent of the 8-inch and 16 per cent of the 9.2-inch. In addition Canada has supplied shell forgings, ammunition components, propel[l]ants, acetone, T.N.T., aluminum, nickel, aeroplane parts, agricultural machinery and timber, beside quantities of railway materials, including no less than 450 miles of rails torn up from Canadian railways, which were shipped direct to France.[23]
Because the private sector was unwilling or unable to operate in certain fields, the Board established seven "National plants" for the production of explosives and propellants, and one for the manufacture of airplanes.[25] The Board also oversaw the production of ships and aircraft.
It also formed several subsidiaries to perform several of the manufacturing functions, which were spread across Canada. These included:
| Company[p] | Location | Function | Extent | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Aeroplanes Ltd. | Wallace Emerson, Toronto, Ontario | 43°40′03″N 79°26′31″W / 43.6675°N 79.442°W | Production of the JN-4(Can) Canuck,[26] the Felixstowe F5L flying boat,[27] and the Avro 504. | The factory had 6 acres (2.4 ha) of floor space, and its construction took only 2.5 months to complete.[28] |
| British Cordite Ltd. | Nobel, Ontario[q] | 45°24′45″N 80°04′59″W / 45.4125°N 80.083055°W | Production of cordite. | The site covered 366 acres (148 ha) and had 155 buildings. |
| British Chemical Co. Ltd. | Trenton, Ontario[r] | 44°07′08″N 77°35′20″W / 44.118853°N 77.588781°W | Production of sulphuric acid, nitric acid, pyro-cotton, nitrocellulose powder and TNT. | The plant covered 255 acres (103 ha) and contained 204 buildings,[29] and at the time was the largest ammunition factory in the British Empire. |
| British Forgings Ltd. | Ashbridge's Bay, Toronto, Ontario[s] | 43°38′47″N 79°21′01″W / 43.646321°N 79.350241°W | Recycling of light steel turnings which arose from shell production, through melting down and recasting into ingots.[31] | The site covered 127.6 acres (51.6 ha), on land leased from the Toronto Harbour Commission, and was at the time the world's largest electrical steel plant.[32] |
| British Munitions Supply Co. Ltd. | Verdun, Quebec | 45°28′19″N 73°34′00″W / 45.471979°N 73.566586°W | Assembly of fuses. | Colloquially known as "La Poudrière", the plant had 4000 (almost exclusively female) employees that assembled eight million fuses.[33] |
| Energite Explosives Co. Ltd.[34] | Haileybury, Ontario[t] | Loading and assembling operations on 18-pounder British shrapnel shells. | The operation had 800 employees and produced eight million completed rounds of ammunition. | |
When the Montreal Gazette profiled the War Toronto on its first visit to Montreal, on April 30, 1919, they described her as the last of 46 vessels built for the Imperial Munitions Board.[35]
The IMB was dissolved in 1919. The process began immediately after the Armistice, when the Ministry of Munitions directed that it would be implemented through the following stages:[24]
- Production of all shells and explosives would cease immediately.
- Gradually cease the production of items no longer required by the Government but which may be useful elsewhere (ie, metals and other materials).
- Maintain contracts for articles still likely to be required (ie, commercial lumber and ships).
Impact
When contracting was transferred from the Shell Committee to the IMB, Flavelle decided that fair wage clauses would not be inserted into future contracts that were granted, although British and Canadian authorities did not object to continuing the prior practice.[36] As the IMB was a British agency, its activities with respect to labour relations did not fall under federal jurisdiction until the passage of an order in council in March 1916 that extended the application of the Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, 1907,[37][38] but Flavelle's opposition continued.[39] This had the effect of disrupting relations with the Trades and Labour Congress of Canada,[40] which would lead to the outbreak of strikes in 1918 and massive labour confrontations in 1919.[41]
Further reading
- "Part IV: Munitions Organisation in Canada". History of the Ministry of Munitions. Vol. II: General Organisation for Munitions Supply. London: Ministry of Munitions. 1922.
- Canada's Part in the Great War (PDF). Ottawa: Department of External Affairs. 1921.
- Canada's War Effort, 1914-1918. Department of Public Information. 1918.
- Women in the Production of Munitions in Canada. Imperial Munitions Board. 1916.
- Bercuson, D.J. (1973). "Organized Labour and the Imperial Munitions Board". Industrial Relations. 28 (3). Université Laval: 602–616. doi:10.7202/028422ar. ISSN 1703-8138. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
- Carnegie, David (1925). The History of Munitions Supply in Canada 1914-1918. London: Longmans, Green and Co. OCLC 4673665.
- Fraser, Peter (1983). "The British 'Shells Scandal' of 1915". Canadian Journal of History. 18 (1). University of Toronto Press: 69–86. doi:10.3138/cjh.18.1.69. ISSN 0008-4107.
- Hopkins, J. Castell (1918a). "The Shell Committee and Sir Sam Hughes: The Making of Munitions". Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs, 1916. War Series. Toronto: The Canadian Annual Review Limited. pp. 269–296. OL 7101035M.
- Hopkins, J. Castell (1918b). Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs, 1917. Toronto: The Canadian Annual Review Limited.
- Hopkins, J. Castell (1919a). Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs, 1918. Toronto: The Canadian Annual Review Limited.
- Hopkins, J. Castell (1919b). Canada at War: A Record of Heroism and Achievement, 1914-1918. Toronto: The Canadian Annual Review Limited. OL 7205289M.
- Moir, Michael B. (1989). "Toronto's Harbourfront at War". Archivaria (28). Association of Canadian Archivists: 126–140. ISSN 0318-6954.
- Meredith, William; Duff, Lyman Poore (1916). Royal Commission on Shell Contracts (PDF). Ottawa: King's Printer.
- Neilson, Keith (2011). "R.H. Brand, the Empire and Munitions from Canada". English Historical Review. CXXVI (523). Oxford University Press: 1430–1455. doi:10.1093/ehr/cer324. ISSN 0013-8266.
- Rider, Peter Edward (1974). The Imperial Munitions Board and its relationship to government, business, and labour, 1914-1920 (PhD). University of Toronto. OCLC 318178043. Archived from the original on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
- Sullivan, Alan (1919). Aviation in Canada, 1917-1918. Toronto: Rous & Mann Limited.
- Vaughan, Henry Hague (10 February 1919). The Manufacture of Munitions in Canada (Speech). Presidential Address, Annual Meeting. Ottawa: Engineering Institute of Canada.
