In re Turner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| In re Turner | |
|---|---|
| Court | United States Circuit Court for the District of Maryland |
| Decided | October 13, 1867 |
| Citations | 24 F. Cas. 337 (C.C.D. Md. 1867); 1 Abb. U.S. 84; 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 147; 1 Am. Law T. Rep. U.S. Cts. 7 |
| Court membership | |
| Judge sitting | Salmon P. Chase (riding circuit) |
In re Turner, 24 F. Cas. 337 (C.C.D. Md. 1867), was a decision of the United States Circuit Court for the District of Maryland applying the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to invalidate a Maryland law allowing courts to apprentice black children to white employers without the consent of their parents. Chief Justice of the United States Salmon P. Chase decided this case while riding circuit.
This case involved a Maryland state law allowing courts to assign African American children to apprenticeships without the consent of their parents. After Elizabeth Turner was forced into an apprenticeship under Philemon T. Hambleton in Talbot County, Maryland, her mother's friend, Charles Henry Minoky, filed a petition of habeas corpus on her behalf. The county Orphans' Court had ordered that Hambleton would only pay $37.5 ($771.90 in 2025) for service lasting until Turner reached adulthood.[1][2]
When summoned to court, Hambleton claimed an interest in retaining Turner as an apprentice but was unwilling to pay for legal counsel, leaving the judgement to the circuit court.[1][2] Despite Chase's requests, no member of the Maryland State Bar Association volunteered to serve as Hambleton's pro bono counsel. Turner was represented by Henry S. Stockbridge, who had previously served in the Maryland General Assembly and garnered legislative and popular support for adopting the Maryland Constitution of 1864 to abolish slavery one year prior to the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Since Turner's family could not afford a lawyer, the Freedmen's Bureau paid for Stockbridge to serve as counsel.[3]