Innovation Cluster Rating

Metric tracking global innovation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Innovation Cluster Ranking is an annual ranking of the world's largest innovation clusters published as part of the Global Innovation Index (GII) by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The ranking identifies geographically concentrated areas of innovation activity, using data on international patent filings, scientific publications and, since 2025, venture-capital deal locations. Unlike rankings based on administrative units, the cluster ranking uses a bottom-up geocoding method and may therefore define clusters that span several municipalities, subnational regions or countries.[1]

The 2025 edition ranked Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou first, followed by Tokyo–Yokohama, San Jose–San Francisco, Beijing and Seoul.[2] The top 100 clusters together accounted for about 70 percent of global Patent Cooperation Treaty filings and venture-capital deal activity, and around half of all scientific publications covered by the ranking.[3]

History

The Global Innovation Index began work on identifying science and technology clusters by means of a bottom-up approach in 2016.[1] A first top-100 cluster ranking was published in the 2017 edition of the GII in a special section titled Identifying and Ranking the World's Largest Clusters of Inventive Activity. That early ranking focused on inventive activity and used patent data, particularly international patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.[4]

The cluster ranking was later developed into a regular component of the Global Innovation Index. By the early 2020s, the methodology combined patent data with scientific publication data in order to capture both inventive and research activity.[5] Since 2020, WIPO has also published an intensity ranking that adjusts innovation activity by estimated cluster population.[3]

In 2025, WIPO revised the ranking by adding venture-capital deal locations as a third indicator. WIPO Director General Daren Tang stated that adding venture-capital activity helped show which clusters were translating scientific research into economic results.[6][1] The revised methodology contributed to Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou overtaking Tokyo–Yokohama as the top-ranked cluster in 2025, because the Chinese-Hong Kong cluster performed more strongly on venture-capital deal activity.[3]

Methodology

The Innovation Cluster Ranking is based on a geocoding and clustering process. In 2025, WIPO used three innovation metrics: the location of inventors listed in published patent applications, the location of authors listed in scientific articles, and the location of firms receiving venture-capital investment.[1]

Patent data are based on published applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. WIPO uses PCT applications because the system applies common procedural rules and uniform filing standards, reducing biases that could arise from comparing national patent systems. For the 2025 ranking, the patent data covered applications published between 2020 and 2024.[1]

Scientific publications are taken from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science. The ranking focuses on science and technology fields and excludes publications from the social sciences and humanities, as well as non-original research items such as meeting abstracts and conference summaries. For the 2025 edition, the scientific publication data covered the years 2019 to 2023.[1]

The venture-capital component, introduced in 2025, uses PitchBook venture-capital data. WIPO counted VC transactions by the headquarters location of the company receiving investment, while excluding pure debt deals and most accelerator-program deals. The 2025 VC data set covered 66,755 locations and 236,046 deals from 2019 to 2023.[1]

Addresses are geocoded using ESRI's ArcGIS World Geocoder and the GeoNames gazetteer. WIPO reported that, in 2025, 98.4 percent of inventor addresses, 99.7 percent of scientific author addresses and 97.1 percent of VC deals were geocoded at city level or better.[1] Cluster formation is based on the DBSCAN algorithm, using a radius of 15 kilometres and a density parameter of 4,500 inventor or author records. Venture-capital locations are not used to form the clusters initially; instead, they are assigned to already-defined cluster boundaries.[1]

The resulting clusters are ranked by counting patents, scientific articles and VC deals within each cluster, calculating each cluster's global share for the three indicators and aggregating the three shares with equal weights. The 2025 procedure identified 237 clusters overall, from which the top 100 were published in the main ranking.[1]

Ranking

In the 2025 ranking, China had the largest number of top-100 clusters with 24, followed by the United States with 22 and Germany with seven. India and the United Kingdom each had four clusters in the top 100.[3]

More information Rank, Cluster ...
Top 100 innovation clusters, 2025
RankClusterEconomy or economies
1ShenzhenHong KongGuangzhou China / Hong Kong
2TokyoYokohama Japan
3San JoseSan Francisco United States
4Beijing China
5Seoul South Korea
6ShanghaiSuzhou China
7New York City United States
8London United Kingdom
9BostonCambridge United States
10Los Angeles United States
11OsakaKobeKyoto Japan
12Paris France
13Hangzhou China
14San Diego United States
15Nanjing China
16SingaporeJohor Bahru Singapore / Malaysia
17WashingtonBaltimore United States
18Wuhan China
19Tel AvivJerusalem Israel
20Seattle United States
21Bengaluru India
22AmsterdamRotterdam Netherlands
23Philadelphia United States
24Chengdu China
25Daejeon South Korea
26Delhi India
27Munich Germany
28Nagoya Japan
29Xi'an China
30Berlin Germany
31Chicago United States
32Stockholm Sweden
33Toronto Canada
34Qingdao China
35Denver United States
36Sydney Australia
37Austin United States
38Houston United States
39Hefei China
40Zürich  Switzerland
41TaipeiHsinchu Taiwan
42Copenhagen Denmark
43Cologne Germany
44Changsha China
45Barcelona Spain
46Mumbai India
47Madrid Spain
48Moscow Russia
49São Paulo Brazil
50Tianjin China
51Minneapolis United States
52Melbourne Australia
53Raleigh United States
54Stuttgart Germany
55BrusselsAntwerp Belgium
56Milan Italy
57Chongqing China
58Istanbul Turkey
59Atlanta United States
60Helsinki Finland
61Dallas United States
62Montréal Canada
63Tehran Iran
64Frankfurt am Main Germany
65Eindhoven Netherlands
66Vancouver Canada
67Miami United States
68Jinan China
69Cambridge United Kingdom
70Harbin China
71Dublin Ireland
72Changchun China
73Portland United States
74Vienna Austria
75Shenyang China
76Pittsburgh United States
77Oxford United Kingdom
78Phoenix United States
79Mexico City Mexico
80Zhengzhou China
81Xiamen China
82Rome Italy
83Cairo Egypt
84Chennai India
85Oslo Norway
86Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
87HeidelbergMannheim Germany
88Dalian China
89Warsaw Poland
90Lyon France
91Hamburg Germany
92Salt Lake City United States
93Ningbo China
94Manchester United Kingdom
95Busan South Korea
96Ann Arbor United States
97Göteborg Sweden
98MacauZhuhai China
99Ningde China
100Zhenjiang China
Close

[3]

Reception

The ranking has been cited in international and regional media coverage of technology policy, national competitiveness and innovation geography.[7][8][9][10][11]

The rise of Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou to first place received particular attention in Chinese and Hong Kong media. Xinhua, in a report republished by the English-language website of the State Council of China, described the result as the first time the cluster had overtaken Tokyo–Yokohama and linked the ranking to the development of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area.[12] Time Out Hong Kong similarly reported that the 2025 ranking had recognized Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou as the world's leading innovation hub after WIPO added venture-capital activity to the methodology.[13]

See also

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI