J. Sai Deepak

Deepak was born in Hyderabad in a Tamil Brahmin family.^[6] He studied at St. Anthony's High School in Hyderabad. He then graduated in mechanical engineering from Anna University and completed law from IIT Kharagpur's Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law.^[7]

Deepak has been part of Basmati Geographical Indication litigation, as the Special Counsel for the Government of Madhya Pradesh, seeking inclusion of the state as part of the Basmati Geographical Indication.^[8]

Deepak argued the case against the entry of women to Sabarimala Temple and had supported 'ready to wait' campaign. He argued against the entry, stating that the Hindu deity Ayyappan observes naishtika brahmacharya ("lifelong celibacy").^[9] He was also a counsel in a petition to allow priests of any caste to be priests at Sabarimala, the priesthood at the temple has historically been open to only Malayali Brahmins.^[10] The Kerala High Court ruled in favor of the traditional practices.

Deepak represented the Travancore royal family for their right to manage the estates of the Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram.^[11] The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of the family.^[12][13]

Deepak was the counsel for Anand Ranganathan in the contempt of court case against the latter for endorsing the criticism of Justice S. Muralidhar by S. Gurumurthy and Vivek Agnihotri.^[14] The Delhi High Court closed the proceedings against Ranganathan.^[15]

Deepak writes two blogs, one named Yukti on constitutional theory and legal philosophy; and one named The Demanding Mistress on civil, commercial and intellectual property law. An article in the latter blog was cited by the Madras High Court in its decision on the TVS Motor Company vs. Bajaj Auto Limited intellectual property dispute.^[16]

Deepak is a Hindutva activist.^[1] He believes that the several good qualities of the knowledge systems of ancient Hindu civilization, mixed with the good qualities of modern education systems, can be a template for modern Indian education systems, which he considers to have multiple drawbacks.^[17][18] He opposes the Dravidian movement and Periyarite thought, and claims they are Western interventions in Southern Indian societal fault lines.^[19] He has written an article, where he discussed limitations imposed by the Indian Constitution against Hindu majoritarian expression. He had criticized the provisions for Hindu majority authority being subject to judicial review and being overruled if it conflicts with constitutional morality.^[17]

Deepak's talk on the Uniform Civil Code in Bengaluru at a Karnataka Bar Association event was faced with opposition from a group of lawyers who wanted the event to be cancelled in an attempted case of deplatforming, but it wasn't.^[20]

Deepak has participated in multiple debates, the prominent ones being with Saurabh Kirpal on same sex marriage;^[21] with S. Y. Quraishi and Manish Tewari on the Uniform Civil Code;^[22] with Shashi Tharoor on decoloniality;^[23] and with AG Krishna Menon and Sanjay Nirupam on nationalism.^[24] In 2021, during the launch of Shashi Tharoor's book ''The Battle of Belonging'', Deepak participated in a public discussion with Tharoor, distinguishing between nationalism and patriotism. Rebutting Tharoor's critiques, Deepak also argued that the common understanding of "Hindu nationalism" offers a "truncated view" of the identity. So instead, he advocated for the broader framework of 'Hindu (Dharmic) civilisationalism.' To emphasize that the Hindu civilizational identity transcends modern political boundaries and 20th-century politics, Deepak stated that he was prepared to completely discard V.D. Savarkar as its sole defining figurehead, even arguing that it is a grave injustice to the society to reduce an ancient civilization to a single individual used as a straw man.^[25] Deepak is also a frequent orator, having spoken at multiple universities, as well as at literature and cultural festivals.^[26]

• Swapan Dasgupta
• Rajiv Malhotra
• Sanjeev Sanyal
• Bibek Debroy
• Vikram Sampath