Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name AO KARELRYBFLOT v Appellant Arthur UDOVENKO and others Respondents
Decided17 December 1999
Citation[2000] 2 NZLR 24
| Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | AO KARELRYBFLOT v Appellant Arthur UDOVENKO and others Respondents |
| Decided | 17 December 1999 |
| Citation | [2000] 2 NZLR 24 |
| Transcript | Court of Appeal judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Richardson P, Gault J, Keith J, Blanchard J, Tipping J |
Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko [2000] 2 NZLR 24 is a cited case in New Zealand confirming that the doctrine of frustration can cover employment contracts.[1]