Chiller has publicly questioned the world No. 20's position in the Olympic team, which has angered the 21-year-old who has made a conscious effort to try to clean up his image after a drama-plagued opening to his career. At the heart of frustrations is Chiller's comments just over a week ago in which she put Kyrgios in the same category as the recently under fire Tomic.
In her latest comments, Chiller declared on Friday: "Kyrgios doesn't really understand what it means to be an Australian Olympian".
Chiller's comments have been deemed by some as uninformed given she has not met or spoken to Kyrgios or his team. However, she continues to hang the axe over the controversial athlete's head.[13]
In January 2024 Nick Kyrgios suggested that due to his treatment by AOC and particularly Kitty Chiller he would not represent Australia at the 2024 Summer Olympics.[14] Kyrgios stated:
"“The way I was treated by the Australian Olympic Committee and former chef de mission Kitty Chiller will never be forgotten."[15]
Chiller has been sanctioned for her role in “judging irregularities” at an Olympic qualification event in 2021 and banned from representing international gymnastic bodies for two years.[16] During the event two insufficiently qualified Superior Jury made changes to scores that resulted in change of ranking in Olympic qualification. The event was riddled with technical and behavioural breaches. Chiller was, at the time of the relevant facts, a GA (Gymnastics Australia), OGU (Oceania Gymnastics Union) and FIG (International Gymnastics Federation) official. Chiller, in her capacity of President of the OGU and CEO of GA, breached FIG General Judges’ Rules and FIG Code of Discipline. She further breached her general duty of diligence and care enshrined in FIG Code of Ethics and FIG Statutes as described above.[12] During the disciplinary proceedings Chiller was found by the Gymnastics Ethics Foundation (GEF) to have provided a false sworn statement to the Court of Arbitration for Sport about her role in a judging controversy at a qualifying event for the Tokyo Olympics.[17]
A parent of abuse victim alleged that Kitty Chiller, then CEO of Gymnastics Australia (GA), improperly ended an investigation in 2018 despite multiple parents providing evidence of concerns.
When the parent later lodged a formal complaint about Chiller’s decision to close the 2018 investigation, the complaint was rejected as “out of scope” under the Supplementary Complaints Management Process (SCMP). The issue: the SCMP only allowed complaints about direct abuse or harassment toward athletes, not about how officials handled past allegations.
Later it was revealed that the supposedly independent SCMP was co-drafted by Gymnastics Australia, including personnel from the CEO’s office. This raised concerns because the process ultimately shielded officials—including Chiller—from scrutiny about their handling of abuse allegations.
The SCMP’s narrow scope excluded complaints about officials who may have mishandled or ignored abuse allegations, which meant complaints involving Chiller’s administrative decisions could not be investigated. [18]