List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 600
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The United States Supreme Court is the court of last resort in the United States, so its decisions reflect the final, binding interpretations of federal law and the United States Constitution. The court issued several opinions in June 2023, the final month of the 2022 term. It published nine of them in Volume 600 of the United States Reports.
At the time these cases were decided, the Supreme Court's lead editor of its opinions was Rebecca Anne Womeldorf, the reporter of decisions.[1]
| Case name | Docket no. | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Moore v. Harper | 600 U.S. 1 | June 27, 2023 |
| The Federal Elections Clause does not vest exclusive and independent authority in state legislatures to set the rules regarding federal elections, so a state supreme court may review that state's congressional districting plans for compliance with state law.[2] | ||
| Counterman v. Colorado | 600 U.S. 66 | June 27, 2023 |
| In criminal cases about true threats, the First Amendment requires a state to prove that the defendant had some subjective understanding of the statements' threatening nature, and the defendant must have said the threat at least recklessly.[3] | ||
| Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. | 600 U.S. 122 | June 27, 2023 |
| A Pennsylvania law requiring out-of-state companies that register to do business in Pennsylvania to agree to appear in Pennsylvania courts is consistent with Due Process.[4] | ||
| Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College | 600 U.S. 181 | June 29, 2023 |
| Harvard's admissions program violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[5] | ||
| Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic International, Inc. | 600 U.S. 412 | June 29, 2023 |
| The Lanham Act does not apply to foreign conduct.[6] | ||
| Groff v. DeJoy | 600 U.S. 447 | June 29, 2023 |
| Title VII requires an employer that denies a religious accommodation to show that the burden of granting an accommodation would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business.[7] | ||
| Biden v. Nebraska | 600 U.S. 477 | June 30, 2023 |
| (1) At least Missouri has standing to challenge the Secretary’s program. (2) The HEROES Act allows the Secretary to "waive or modify" existing statutory or regulatory provisions applicable to financial assistance programs under the Education Act, but does not allow the Secretary to rewrite that statute to the extent of canceling $430 billion of student loan principal.[8] | ||
| Department of Education v. Brown | 600 U.S. 551 | June 30, 2023 |
| Case vacated because the student loan members lacked standing. [9] | ||
| 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis | 600 U.S. 570 | June 30, 2023 |
| The First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees.[10] | ||