Lodha Committee

The establishment of the Lodha Committee was the result of the report submitted by the Justice Mukul Mudgal Committee in November 2014 before the Supreme Court of India, after an investigation into the 2013 IPL betting scandal. ^{[5] [6] [7] [8] [9]}

While analysing the Mudgal Committee report on 22 January 2015, the Supreme Court constituted the Lodha Committee with the following members-

• Justice R.M. Lodha, former Chief Justice of India – Chairman.
• Justice Ashok Bhan, former Judge, Supreme Court of India – Member.
• Justice R.V. Raveendran, former Judge, Supreme Court of India – Member.

The purpose of the Lodha Committee was to analyse and recommend implementable actions for improving the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), assess the quantum of punishment for Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra in the Indian Premier League (IPL) betting scandal, and analyse the role of Sundar Raman. ^[10]

Lodha Committee presented three main reports. One related with punishment to Raj Kundra and Gurunath Meiyappan was presented on 14 July 2015 while the detailed report with wide and lasting recommendations was presented in December 2015. Through this report, the Committee also gave clean chit to Sundar Rajan. ^[11][12]

The recommendations of the Lodha Committee shook the BCCI hierarchy and its related associations. The BCCI raised objections to the recommendations and approached the Supreme Court.

In March 2016, the BCCI filed a detailed counter-affidavit in the Supreme Court severely opposing the recommendations of the Lodha Committee report. It opposed majority of the recommendation of the Lodha Committee, including the ‘one person, one post’ rule, age limit and tenure limit, bar on ministers or government servants holding positions in the BCCI and ‘one State, one vote’ rule. ^{[19] [20]}

The final judgment by the Supreme Court in this matter was delivered on 18 July 2016, which upheld majority of the Lodha Committee recommendations, while modifying or rejecting some of them. This paved the way for a major change within the BCCI. ^{[21] [22] [23] [24]}

The major reforms accepted by the Supreme Court included that the BCCI's Working Committee was replaced with a nine-member Apex Council, which included a representative from the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). Player associations (including a women’s representative) were also established. The recommendation of One State, One Vote was accepted, so that each state association was given a single vote, removing voting rights from institutional units like Railways, Services, and Universities. An Ethics Officer was to be created to handle conflict of interest issues and to the mandate to disclose assets. The post of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and professional management teams to run the daily affairs of the board, was accepted. The recommendation of 70 years age cap for officials and strict bar against ministers and government servants holding posts was also accepted.

In contrast, the recommendation to legalize betting in cricket was rejected by the Supreme Court, as being a matter for the legislature. It also rejected the proposal to bring the BCCI under RTI Act, as being a private entity. Unlike the Lodha Committee recommendation, the "cooling off period' was modified in 2018 so that it comes into operation only after two consecutive terms (6 years) on the Apex Council. the recommendation to place heavy restrictions on TV commercials during live match broadcasts was similarly rejected by the Supreme Court.

The Court kept the members of the Lodha Committee to assist in the transition process and gave the BCCI maximum six months to implement the given transition.

The final implementation of Lodha Committee report was completed on 09 August 2018, when the Supreme Court formally approved the new, finalized BCCI Constitution, as directed by the Court. ^{[25] [26]}