Loxomeryx
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Loxomeryx Temporal range: Early Miocene, ~ | |
|---|---|
Scientific classification  | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Mammalia |
| Order: | Artiodactyla |
| Family: | †Lagomerycidae |
| Genus: | †Loxomeryx Fu et al., 2026 |
| Type species | |
| †Stephanocemas guangheensis Deng et al., 2014 | |
Loxomeryx (lit. 'angled ruminant') is an extinct genus of deer-like ruminant mammal in the clade Lagomerycidae (or Lagomerycinae). It is known from partial mandibular and cranial remains, including cranial appendages ('antlers'), found in the Early Miocene (~17.2 million years ago) Dongxiang Formation of China. The genus contains a single species, Loxomeryx guangheensis, which was originally placed in the genus Stephanocemas in 2014, before being transferred to its own genus in 2026. The antlers have a distinctive palm-like morphology, supported by a slender pedicle (base) angled backward.
.jpg)
In May 2011, Tao Deng and a team of researchers from the Chinese Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP), Northwest University's Department of Geology, and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, conducted fieldwork in the Dalanggou quarry in Maijiaxiang Township of Guanghe County, China. Several geologic formations of the Linxia Basin have outcrops at this locality and preserve mammal fossils, including (from oldest to youngest) the Shangzhuang, Dongxiang, Hujialiang, and Liushu formations. The research team collected fossil material of a crown-antlered deer-like animal from the Dongxiang Formation. The material they collected included a right antler, three cheek teeth, and two tarsal bones (an astragalus and calcaneum), all of which are permanently accessioned at the IVPP.[1]
In 2014, Deng and colleagues described these remains as belonging to a new species of the genus Stephanocemas, a deer-like mammal in the clade Lagomerycidae which has a broad East, Central, and Southeast Asian distribution.[2] They named it Stephanocemas guangheensis, with the specific name referencing the discovery of the fossils in Guanghe County. The researchers established the isolated antler (specimen IVPP V 18584) as the holotype (name-bearing) specimen. They further referred the remaining material (IVPP V 18585.1–5) to this species, while noting they appeared to belong to an individual much larger than that which produced the holotype.[1]
In February 2026, Jiao Fu and colleagues described additional lagomerycid material recovered from the Citan locality of the Dongxiang Formation, which is about 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) away from Dalanggou and represents the same fossiliferous horizons. Previously, only bones of the proboscidean Platybelodon tongxinensis had been reported from this site.[3] These discoveries included IVPP V 31500, a much more complete portion of the skull, including the dorsal part of the braincase and both complete antlers, and IVPP V 33252, the middle part of the right mandible with three preserved teeth (p4–m2). The researchers identified these new specimens as belonging to 'Stephanocemas' guangheensis based on the small size and nearly indistinguishable morphology of the antlers in both specimens. However, they also identified characteristics distinguishing this species from members of any other lagomerycid genus, including Stephanocemas. As such, they named the new genus Loxomeryx for 'S.' guangheensis, creating the new combination Loxomeryx guangheensis. The generic name combines the Greek words loxos, meaning 'angled' or 'oblique', and meryx, referring to ruminant mammals, referencing the bases of the taxon's antler's, which are inclined posteriorly.[4]
Fu and colleagues (2026) noted that the teeth and tarsal bones described by Deng et al. (2014) and referred to 'S.' guangheensis should not be regarded as belonging to this species due to their significantly larger size. Furthermore, they mentioned that additional antlers consistent in size with the teeth and tarsals had been found in the Citan locality, distinct from Loxomeryx but reminiscent of Stephanocemas. As such, they likely belong to the latter genus rather than the former.[4]
.png)