Advantages:
The MS2-BioTRAP method is fast, flexible, and easy to set up; it scales well and allows the study of the physiological conditions of the protein-RNA interactions.[7] The MS2 tag is also effective for small molecules when an MS2 coat protein is used to isolate a variety of ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs).[8]
Disadvantages:
One caveat of MS2 tagging is that many copies of the MS2 stem-loop inside the RNA need to be added to produce enough signal to view and track one RNA molecule in the nucleus.[5] When tracking more than one RNA sequence in the nucleus of cultured cells, more than one target sequence is needed.[5] This could be affected by the MS2 protein, which has a classical basic nuclear localization signal (NLS), so it could affect the location of the RNA complex, and the nucleus would have most of the GFP-MS2 [5](Robert Singer’s lab).[6] The accumulation of GFP-MS2 in the nucleus will result in strong nuclear fluorescence signals, which will delay or prevent the analysis of RNA nuclear localization because it will hinder the analysis of splicing, RNA editing, the nuclear export of RNA, and RNA translation.[6] Moreover, due to the addition of the tag, the RNA secondary structure may introduce an artifact.[5]
Additionally, the small noncoding RNA (sRNA) expression levels and regulatory properties will be influenced by MS2 tag.[8] Also, by using MS2 as an affinity tag to purify a protein in E. coli bacteria, scientists expressed MS2-MBP, which is an MS2 coat protein carrying mutations fused with maltose-binding proteins. The mutations prevented oligomerization.[8]