Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc.
2022 United States Supreme Court case
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 596 U.S. 880 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Medicare Secondary Payer statute does not authorize disparate-impact liability, and the Marietta Plan's coverage terms for outpatient dialysis were lawful because those terms applied uniformly to all covered individuals.[1][2]
Full case nameMarietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc.
Docket no.20-1641
MajorityKavanaugh
| Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided June 21, 2022 | |
| Full case name | Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc. |
| Docket no. | 20-1641 |
| Citations | 596 U.S. 880 (more) |
| Holding | |
| The Medicare Secondary Payer statute does not authorize disparate-impact liability, and the Marietta Plan’s coverage terms for outpatient dialysis were lawful because those terms applied uniformly to all covered individuals. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kavanaugh |
| Dissent | Kagan, joined by Sotomayor |
