Mile Budak

Upon the proclamation of the Independent State of Croatia (NDH) on 10 April 1941, Budak became the state's chief propagandist^[9] and Minister of Education and Faith.^[10] As such, he publicly stated that forcible expulsion and religious conversion of the ethnic Serb minority was the official national policy. Budak signed the Ustashe regime's racial laws against Serbs, Jews, and Roma.^[11] Croatian novelist Miroslav Krleža described Budak as "a minister of culture with a machine gun".^[1]

Budak pursued in his positions virulent anti-Serb agitation. Thus, he remarked on 6 June 1941 in Križevci:

"The Serbs came to our territories, because they were persecuted by the Turkish gangs, they came as plunderers and the filth from the Balkans. We can not allow our national state to be ruled by two nations. There is only one God, and there is only one nation, that is ruling: and this is the Croat nation. These ones, who arrived here 200, 300 years ago, might go back to whence they came. [...] One has to know, that we are a state that has two religions: the Catholic, and the Mohammedan."^[12]

According to an alleged statement, reportedly said by Budak, the Ustaše plan was to "kill one part of the Serbs, evacuate another and lead over one part to Catholicism and thus transform them into Croats." The origins of this statement are unclear. According to Veljko Bulajić, the statement originates from a speech in Gospić on 22 July 1941. Other authors claim that it came in a radio broadcast, while some attribute it to Dido Kvaternik. In a report to the Yugoslav government-in-exile, the statement was attributed to Andrija Artuković. There are various versions of the quote that differ in wording. The historian Tomislav Dulić said that he "tried to find a primary source that could confirm the existence and exact wording of this statement", but was "not been able to ascertain whether such a statement actually exists".^[13]

He later became a Croatian envoy to Nazi Germany (November 1941 – April 1943) and the Foreign Minister (May 1943 – November 1943).^[14][15] Following the Independent State of Croatia evacuation to Austria, Budak was captured by British military authorities and handed over to Josip Broz Tito's Partisans on 18 May 1945. He was court-martialled (before the military court of the 2nd Yugoslav army) in Zagreb on 6 June 1945 and was sentenced to death by hanging the same day. His execution the following day took place exactly 13 years after the assassination attempt on his life.^[16] During the trial, Budak was described to behave "cowardly, constantly weeping, and claiming he was not guilty of anything".^[17]

After the war, his books were banned by Yugoslav Communist authorities. Thus, many Croatian nationalists viewed Budak as a great figure of Croatian literature, equal, if not superior to the leftist Miroslav Krleža.^[2] Following Croatian independence in the early 1990s, the Croatian Democratic Union aimed to reinterpret the Ustasha as a Croatian patriotic force. In early 1993, the collected works of Mile Budak were republished, and Croatian writer Giancarlo Kravar at the time wrote: "... Ustashism, in its history, was undoubtly also a positive political movement for the state-building affirmation of Croatianism, the expression of the centuries-long aspiration of the Croatian people".^[18]

Elsewhere and more recently, Budak was described as "a mediocre Croatian author",^[19] "a mediocre writer at best",^[20] "a writer of middling originality and imagination"^[21] or a writer which literary work is "average and without lasting value".^[22]

Following Croatian independence, the Franjo Tuđman government renamed streets after Budak.^[23] As of August 2004, there were seventeen cities in Croatia which had streets named after Budak.^[24] In 2013, the Ministry of Public Administration announced plans to rename all those streets as they were unconstitutional.^[25] The Aleksa Šantić Street in Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina was named after Budak between 1995 and 2022.^[26] The Archdiocese of Zagreb declared at one point^[when?] that it had no objection to the erection of a monument dedicated to the dead Ustaša leader.^[27]