Money v Ven-Lu-Ree Ltd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CourtPrivy Council
Full case name Richard John Money (Appellant) v Robert Arthur Playle, David Larkin & Pukieto Fale (First Respondents), Ven-Lu-Ree Ltd (Second Respondent), Stuart Craig Ennor (Third Respondent)
Decided27 July 1989
Citation[1988] 2 NZLR 414, aff'd [1989] 3 NZLR 129
| Money v Ven-Lu-Ree Ltd | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Full case name | Richard John Money (Appellant) v Robert Arthur Playle, David Larkin & Pukieto Fale (First Respondents), Ven-Lu-Ree Ltd (Second Respondent), Stuart Craig Ennor (Third Respondent) |
| Decided | 27 July 1989 |
| Citation | [1988] 2 NZLR 414, aff'd [1989] 3 NZLR 129 |
| Transcript | Privy Council ruling Court of Appeal judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Ackner, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, Lord Lowry |
Money v Ven-Lu-Ree Ltd [1988] 2 NZLR 414, aff'd [1989] 3 NZLR 129 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the issue of certainty in contract formation.[1][2][3]
