North Panola School District
School district in Mississippi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The North Panola School District is a public school district based in Sardis, Mississippi, U.S.[4]
| North Panola School District | |
|---|---|
| Address | |
470 U.S. Highway 51 North
Sardis , Mississippi, 38666United States | |
| District information | |
| Type | Public |
| Grades | PreK–12[1] |
| NCES District ID | 2803210[1] |
| Students and staff | |
| Students | 1,364[1] |
| Teachers | 95.56 (FTE)[1] |
| Staff | 142.17[1] |
| Student–teacher ratio | 14.27[1] |
| Other information | |
| Website | northpanolaschools |
| North Panola High School | |
|---|---|
| Location | |
 | |
500 Highway 51 North , , 38666 United States 40.395729°N 75.262672°W | |
| Information | |
| Type | Public high school |
Principal | Andre Jones |
| Staff | 26.34 (FTE)[2] |
| Enrollment | 359[2] (2023-24) |
Student to teacher ratio | 13.63[2] |
| Colors | Red, black and white[3] |
| Nickname | Cougars[3] |
| Website | |
In addition to Sardis, the district also serves the town of Como and the Panola County portion of Crenshaw as well as rural areas in northern Panola County.
Schools
- North Panola High School (Sardis; Grades 9-12)
- North Panola Junior High School (Como, Grades 6-8)
- Crenshaw Elementary School (Crenshaw; Grades K-5)
- Como Elementary School (Como; Grades PK-5)
- Green Hill Intermediate (Sardis; Grades 3-5)
Demographics
2023-24 school year
There were a total of 1,364 students enrolled in the North Panola School District as of the 2023–2024 school year.The gender makeup of district was 50% female and 50% male. The racial makeup of the district was 95.4% African American, 2.8% White, 0.3% Hispanic, 0.1% Asian, 0.3% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 1.1% two or more races.
| School Year | Enrollment | Gender Makeup | Racial Makeup | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Asian | African American |
Hispanic | Native American |
White | ||
| 2005-06[5] | 1,850 | 49% | 51% | 0.11% | 97.14% | 0.32% | – | 2.43% |
| 2004-05[5] | 1,866 | 48% | 52% | 0.11% | 96.73% | 0.32% | – | 2.84% |
| 2003-04[5] | 1,751 | 49% | 51% | 0.11% | 97.49% | 0.06% | – | 2.34% |
| 2002-03[6] | 1,818 | 49% | 51% | 0.11% | 97.08% | 0.17% | – | 2.64% |
Accountability statistics
| 2006-07[7] | 2005-06[8] | 2004-05[9] | 2003-04[10] | 2002-03[11] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District Accreditation Status | Probation | Accredited | Advised | Accredited | Accredited |
| School Performance Classifications | |||||
| Level 5 (Superior Performing) Schools | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Level 4 (Exemplary) Schools | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Level 3 (Successful) Schools | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Level 2 (Under Performing) Schools | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Level 1 (Low Performing) Schools | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Not Assigned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
