Operation Shylock
1993 novel by Philip Roth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Operation Shylock: A Confession is a 1993 novel by American novelist Philip Roth.
First edition cover | |
| Author | Philip Roth |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Genre | Fiction Autobiographical fiction Spy fiction |
| Publisher | Simon & Schuster |
Publication date | 8 April 1993 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Pages | 398 |
| ISBN | 0-671-70376-5 |
| OCLC | 27034867 |
Plot
The novel follows narrator "Philip Roth" on a journey to Israel, where he attends the trial of accused war criminal John Demjanjuk and becomes involved in an intelligence mission—the "Operation Shylock" of the title.
While in Israel, the narrator seeks out an impersonator who has appropriated his identity. This man has Roth's facial features, goes by the same name, and uses Roth's status as a celebrity author to spread "Diasporism", a counter-Zionist ideology advocating the return, to Europe, of all formerly European Jews who became Israelis in order to avert a second Holocaust by Arab countries.[1]
The ensuing struggle between this doppelgänger-like stranger and "Roth", played against the backdrop of the Demjanjuk trial and the First Intifada, constitutes the book's primary storyline. Roth becomes romantically involved with Jinx Posseski, his doppelgänger's lover and partner in crime. This makes it harder for him to hold the line against the imposter, because he feels guilty. He also has several unsuccessful face-to-face confrontations with his double; each time, the other "Philip Roth" (whom Roth dubs "Moishe Pipik") gets the better of the original, genuine Roth by accusing him of taking his fame too lightly, and eschewing his responsibilities to people in the real world.
Because the central proposition of "Diasporism" is highly amenable to the PLO, a former friend named George Ziad, who knew the real Philip Roth in college, attempts to put Roth in contact with the actual PLO. (Ziad thinks Roth is a Diasporist, thanks to Moishe Pipik.) Roth intends to refuse until he is contacted by agents of Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency. They urge him to accept Ziad's offer, so that he can become an undercover agent and gather intelligence for Israel.
Roth apparently does so, but the end of the book reveals that Operation Shylock is (supposedly) missing an excised chapter where Roth describes the details and outcome of his Mossad mission. The book ends without resolving the questions the "lost" chapter raises, including whether Roth continues to support the Israeli cause, and whether or not it is important for Roth to tell his readers such details about his life. The revelation that Mossad has been watching Roth (largely through disguised agents) and trying to involve him in Israel's political intrigues leaves Roth looking rather hapless and myopic in terms of his ability to understand realpolitik and the way power functions in his present-day (the year 1988).
Connections
Operation Shylock is one of the "Philip Roth Books" - novels by Roth in which the main character is named Philip Roth; these also include non-fiction works The Facts: A Novelist's Autobiography and Patrimony and novels Deception and The Plot Against America.[2] The association between Roth and his protagonists had become one of the characteristic features of Roth's writing.[3] Roth had expressed frustration with the way people had read his fictional protagonists as stand-ins for the author, but also deliberately employed the effect of giving the impression of "confession".[3]
A major concern of Roth's fiction since the 1970s has been the relationship between a novelist's life and work. Though this topic is thoroughly explored in Roth's series of Zuckerman novels, Operation Shylock even more radically attacks the distinction between art and life by making a fairly mimetic version of the author the protagonist of an obviously invented (though plausible) story. Despite this effort, separating the real from the fictional in Operation Shylock is not wholly impossible. For example, several minor characters from the novel are actual people including John Demjanjuk, Claire Bloom, and Israeli writer and Roth friend Aharon Appelfeld. The post-operative nervous breakdown mentioned in the prologue and in other books by or about Roth[4][5][6] was drawn from Roth's real-life experience of the temporary side-effects of a post-operative sedative (triazolam) which was later banned in several countries after discovery that the manufacturer had not published studies showing a high risk of short term psychiatric disturbance.[7][8][9][10]
Themes
The self
One of the book's main themes is the subjectivity, indeterminacy and fragmentation of the self.[11][12] Protagonist Philip's halcion-induced breakdown is described as a process of mental "self-disintegration" or coming apart.[13] This internal challenge to the coherence of Roth's self is compounded by the external challenge when Philip discovers he is being impersonated by another Philip Roth, whom he nicknames Moshe Pipik.[14] Philip's decision in turn to impersonate Pipik emphasises that the self is contingent and improvised.[2] Philip is eventually able to tell Pipik in earnest "I am Philip Roth and you are Philip Roth".[15]
At the same time, the narrative is set against the backdrop of the trial of John Demjanjuk, which revolves around a differently contested claim of identity - whether Demjanjuk had been Ivan the Terrible, a notoriously monstrous guard at the Nazi extermination camp of Treblinka.[13] Considering the seemingly mutually excluding lives of a Nazi war criminal and a peaceful family man in Ohio, Philip concludes that Demjanjuk is not unusual in this regard, and indeed that Nazis managed to enjoy this duality simultaneously.[16]
Israel and Jewish identity
Operation Shylock is also, together with The Counterlife, one of Roth's two "Israel novels".[16] Multiple characters set out lengthy and explicit rejections of Zionism and the Israeli Jewishness. Pipik's Diasporism foresees the hostility of Israel's Arab neighbors as presaging a new Holocaust,[17] the reverse of the Zionist conception of Israel as a safe haven.[16] Palestinian George Ziad insists that the American Jew is authentic and apex of Jewish qualities as opposed to the Israeli Jew.[16] Conversely, Mossad agent Smilesburger appeals to Philip's loyalty as a Jew, both to engage in a covert mission for the state of Israel, and afterwards to excise its details from the book.[18] All make moral and political claims on Philip, who finds that though he is sympathetic to Pipik's and Ziad's arguments, he accedes to the demands of the Israeli.[19]
Fact and fiction
The relationship between fact and fiction is a theme of all the "Philip Roth" books.[20] Operation Shylock destabilizes the dichotomy between the two, anchoring a clearly surreal narrative in a real historical and personal context.[21]
Purported veracity
In March 1993, Roth maintained the veracity of his novel to The New York Times' Esther B. Fein, who wrote, "Operation Shylock, Roth insists with a post-modern straight face, is a 'confession,' not a novel, and he means for us to take this every bit as seriously as the contents labels demanded by the strictures of the Food and Drug Administration. 'The book is true,' Roth said the other day. 'As you know, at the end of the book a Mossad operative made me realize it was in my interest to say this book was fiction. And I became quite convinced that it was in my interest to do that. So I added the note to the reader as I was asked to do. I'm just a good Mossadnik.'"[22] Debra Shostak considers that the autobiographical presentation led readers to "want to know if the events, ranging from the plausible to the implausible, happened verifiably."[23]
Press investigations revealed that some of Philip Roth's encounters in Operation Shylock had happened to the author, such as Roth's interview of Appelfeld, though not as described in the book.[24] In 2017, Roth objected to Wikipedia ascribing to the author the Triazolam-induced breakdown undergone by Operation Shylock's protagonist.[3] He objected that "there is no way to conclude anything with certainty about the flesh-and-blood author from something that is said about a character in a novel".[3]
Reception
Roth's long-time professional acquaintance John Updike gave the novel a famously caustic[25] review in The New Yorker.[26] Updike found the book "an orgy of argumentation...this hard-pressed reviewer was reminded not only of Shaw but of Hamlet, which also has too many characters, numerous long speeches, and a vacillating, maddening hero who in the end shows the right stuff." Updike closed with the admonition, "It should be read by anyone who cares about (1) Israel and its repercussions, (2) the development of the postmodern, deconstruction-minded novel, (3) Philip Roth." In The New York Times Book Review,[27] novelist and poet D. M. Thomas called the novel "an impassioned quarrel...Despite the seriousness of its theme, the book carries the feeling of creative joy. One feels that Roth feels that he's let rip."
The novel appears to have grown in stature since publication. In 2006, when New York Times Book Review editor Sam Tanenhaus mailed a short letter to "a couple of hundred prominent writers, critics, editors,"[28] asking that they identify the best work of American fiction published in the preceding quarter-century, several respondents named Operation Shylock. (The eventual winner was Toni Morrison's 1987 Beloved.) Reporting upon Roth's reception of the 2011 Man Booker International Prize, critic Jonathan Derbyshire of the New Statesman[29] wrote, "The judging panel make the inevitable reference in their summing-up to Roth's extraordinary fecundity over the past 15 years or so, at a stage in his life when 'most novelists are in decline'. The most notable fruits of Roth's Indian summer, 1995's Sabbath's Theater and American Pastoral, published two years later, are certainly among his most luminous achievements. But two slightly earlier novels stand out for me, both of them hectically metafictional works partly set in Israel: The Counterlife (1986) and Operation Shylock."
After Roth's death, The New York Times asked several prominent writers to name their favorite book by him. Daniel Mendelsohn cast his vote for Operation Shylock, writing: "Here, the coruscating linguistic brilliance, the profanity and playfulness (and the deep, often irritated engagement with Jewishness) that characterizes his earlier novels rise to new — and, I would say, philosophical — heights. For the two Roths finally meet in a Jerusalem that is anxiously hosting the trial of John Demjanjuk, the Ukrainian-born Ohio autoworker who was revealed to have been a sadistic guard at a Nazi death camp: a setting that amplifies the significance of Roth's favorite themes of identity and imposture, truth and fictionality, and gives the ostensibly zany, Quixote-esque plot an ultimately tragic historical resonance."[30]
Awards
Operation Shylock received the 1993 PEN/Faulkner Award for best novel.[31] Roth would eventually become the first three-time winner of the award: for Shylock, 2001's The Human Stain, and 2007's Everyman.