Wikiwand AI

Ortiz v. Jordan

2011 United States Supreme Court case From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.[1][2]

Full case nameOrtiz v. Jordan
Citations562 U.S. 180 (more)
MajorityGinsburg, joined by unanimous
Quick facts Decided January 24, 2011, Full case name ...
Ortiz v. Jordan
Decided January 24, 2011
Full case nameOrtiz v. Jordan
Citations562 U.S. 180 (more)
Holding
A party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityGinsburg, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Close

See also

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks