Patrick D. McGee

McGee ran for the 64th Assembly District seat in election years 1950 through 1956 and won all four times. He sought the 38th District seat in the State Senate in 1962, but lost. He was reelected in the 64th Assembly District in 1966 and 1968,^[1]

McGee gave up his Assembly position to run in the conservatively oriented Los Angeles City Council District 3 in the West San Fernando Valley, which included Woodland Hills, Encino, Tarzana, Northridge, Reseda and Canoga Park.^[3] He won an easy victory in the 1957 primary for a four-year term.

In 1961, however, he did not campaign for reelection but instead ran for mayor; he came in third after Norris Poulson and Sam Yorty, who then met in a runoff election.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2011)

As an Assembly member, McGee was active in a bid to obtain legislation to establish a rapid transit authority in the Los Angeles area and was also in "the thick of the fight to get Feather River water" for Southern California.^[3]

Conflict, 1957. McGee occasioned controversy when he announced that he would keep his State Assembly seat while serving as a city councilman because, he said, he could then work with fellow state legislators on a solution to a squabble between Northern and Southern California over water rights. He said he would accept no salary from the state.^[4] Nevertheless, Attorney-General Pat Brown ruled that McGee's stand presented "a distinct conflict of interests" but that only the Assembly could eject McGee.^[5] City Controller Dan O. Hoye said he would refuse to give McGee his check for July 1957 because of the situation.^[6] On August 1 McGee got neither his pay of $1,000 a month from the city nor his $500-a-month salary from the state because he "presumably" was one of 119 state employees who that month received pay envelopes "mailed out by mistake with nothing in them."^[7] McGee resigned from the Assembly near the end of the month.^[8]

Dodgers, 1958. McGee was one of the three council members—Harold A. Henry and John C. Holland being the others—who voted in 1958 against a proposal to turn Chavez Ravine over to the Brooklyn Dodgers for use as a baseball stadium.^[9] Calling the proposed pact with the Dodgers stupid, immoral and misleading, he claimed the contract:^[10]

1. Did not provide for revenue for the city.
2. Contained an "illegal and immoral" provision to divide any future oil revenues between the city and a trust fund to be spent for a Dodger youth program, which represented an agreement to "spend public money for private individuals."
3. Failed to specify that if the land were not used for baseball if would revert to the city.
4. Bound the city to spend up to $2 million to improve the land before it is turned over to the Dodgers.
5. Was worded so the Dodgers could violate the agreement but still keep title to the land.

Trampolines, 1960. He urged the city Health Department to study the health effects of the popular trampoline centers then opening up in the city.^[11]

Boroughs, 1960. He urged the establishment of a borough system to provide more local representation for the San Fernando Valley.^[12]

• In re McGee, 36 Cal.2d 592 [L. A. No. 21755. In Bank. Jan. 10, 1951.] In re Patrick D. McGee, Contesting Nomination to an Office. Eldon James Markwort, appellant, v. Patrick D. McGee, respondent.
• Join California Patrick D. McGee