Portal talk:Free and open-source software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the portal about Free and open-source software.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the WikiProject Portals talk page.
Archives: 1, 2If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. |
| This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| This portal is a former featured portal candidate. Please see the links under Portal milestones below for its original nomination page and why the nomination failed. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Former featured portal candidate | ||||||||||||||||
Ultimate stunts
Exult
reliable refs:
- http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/ultima/ultima8.htm
- https://www.pelit.fi/artikkelit/ultima-v-lazarus-pc/
- https://www.kotaku.com.au/2008/01/ultima_vi_remade_in_dungeon_siege/ "the best known fan-made Ultima project is Exult."
- http://www.gamestar.de/artikel/hall-of-fame-ultima-7-das-beste-rollenspiel-aller-zeiten,3004525.html "good alternative is exult"
- http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/129994/the_history_of_computer_.php?print=1 "Thankfully, gamers can play Ultima VII using Exult, a GPL-licensed program that attempts to recreate the game on modern operating systems."
- https://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/2007/01/22/games_that_should_be_remastered/3 "only working port"
- http://exult.sourceforge.net/letters.php "Just so that you know. On a personal level I am very excited to see you doing this. Its tough to see games fade out, when the computers or operating systems required to play them go away. - Richard Lord British Garriott"
- https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2010/03/01/a-brief-history-of-modern-retro/
notes
Notice from the Portals WikiProject
WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals. So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 07:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Exploring ways to make Portals easier to maintain
I've been experimenting with ways to make it easier to maintain, update, and change a portal. Check out this demo in a sandbox:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rjjiii/sandbox9&oldid=1332425630
Style changes there are mostly borrowed from French Wikipedia to work better on mobile, dark mode, and print. If you peek at the wikitext of the page, most of the styling is delegated to a single stylesheet. The transcluded "Popular pages" uses just HTML with classes, and all the style comes from separate CSS that could be customized per Portal; right now it's invoked from sandboxes, but can be moved to {{top 7}} or {{portal popular pages}} or anything along those lines. The boxes are handled by {{colored box}} which is more styled by default, but it could be forked over to something like {{content box}}.
The benefits I am going for are: easier maintenance, better support across platforms, and simpler structure.
@Newslinger, John of Reading, and Northamerica1000: I see you all have put work into this portal and thought I would solicit feedback and input even though, it's all still in a kind of rough place. Any thoughts, ideas, concerns, questions, or suggestions? Rjjiii (talk) 23:44, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Visually, I think your demo is a considerable improvement over the existing portal. I would be happy to see it implemented. Thank you for working to make the page more user-friendly. — Newslinger talk 15:53, 12 January 2026 (UTC)





